Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Glossary
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Programs
      • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
      • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
      • Evaluation and Analysis
      • Engagement
      • Research Infrastructure
    • Governance
      • Board of Governors
      • Methodology Committee
      • Committees
        • Engagement, Dissemination, and Implementation Committee
        • Research Transformation Committee
        • Science Oversight Committee
        • Finance and Administration Committee
        • Executive Committee
        • Governance Committee
          • Executive Evaluation and Compensation Subcommittee
        • Scientific Publications Committee
        • Selection Committee
    • Financials and Reports
      • Our Funding
    • Procurement Opportunities
      • Operations Support Funding
      • Research Support Funding
      • Contracted Projects
    • Our Staff
      • Executive Team
      • Office of the Executive Director
        • Evaluation and Analysis
        • Research Infrastructure
      • Office of the General Counsel
      • Science
        • Office of the Chief Science Officer
        • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
        • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
        • Merit Review
        • Peer Review
        • Research Synthesis
      • Engagement
        • Communications
        • Dissemination and Implementation
        • Engagement Awards
        • Office of the Chief Engagement and Dissemination Officer
        • Public and Patient Engagement
        • Public Policy
        • Training
      • Operations
        • Office of the Chief Operations Officer
        • Administrative Services
        • Contracts Management and Administration
        • Finance
        • Human Resources
        • Information Technology
        • Procurement
  • Research & Results
    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Dissemination and Implementation
      • CME/CE Activities
      • Dissemination and Implementation Framework and Toolkit
    • Peer Review
      • Step-by-Step Instructions for Awardees: Peer Review of Draft Final Research Report
      • Peer Review FAQ
    • Research Spotlights
    • About Our Research
      • How We Select Research Topics
        • Generation and Prioritization of Topics for Funding Announcements
        • Topics in the Prioritization Pathway
      • Research We Support
        • National Priorities and Research Agenda
          • How We Developed our National Priorities and Research Agenda
            • Public Comments for PCORI’s National Priorities and Research Agenda
      • Collaborating with Other Research Funders
      • Research Methodology
        • PCORI Methodology Standards
          • Suggest a Topic Area for New Methodology Standards
        • The PCORI Methodology Report
          • Draft Methodology Report Public Comment Period
        • PCORI Methodology Standards and Report FAQ
        • Methodology Standards Academic Curriculum
          • Category 1: Standards for Formulating Research Questions
          • Category 2: Standards Associated with Patient-Centeredness
          • Category 3: Standards for Data Integrity and Rigorous Analyses
          • Category 4: Standards for Preventing and Handling Missing Data
          • Category 5: Standards for Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects
          • Category 6: Standards for Data Registries
          • Category 7: Data Networks as Research-Facilitating Structures
          • Category 8: Standards for Causal Inference Methods
          • Category 9: Standards for Adaptive and Bayesian Trial Designs
          • Category 10: Standards for Studies of Diagnostic Tests
          • Category 11: Standards for Systematic Reviews
        • Methodology Committee - Background
        • Methodology Committee - Workshops and Events
      • Evaluating Our Work
        • Planning Our Evaluation, Reporting the Results
        • PCORI Evaluation Group (PEG)
        • How We Evaluate Key Aspects of Our Work
        • Related Blog Posts
  • Engagement
    • What We Mean by Engagement
      • PCORI’s Stakeholders
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engage with Us
      • Voices of Engagement
        • David White
        • Elizabeth Cox
        • Regina Greer-Smith
        • Kimberly Jinnett
        • Toya Burton
        • David Hahn
        • Rebekah Angove
        • Neely Williams
        • Peter W. Thomas
        • Megan O'Boyle
        • Stephanie Buxhoeveden
      • Become a Merit Reviewer
        • PCORI Stakeholder Reviewer Communities
        • Reviewer Qualifications
        • Reviewer Responsibilities
      • Become a Peer Reviewer
      • Join an Advisory Panel
        • Advisory Panel Openings
        • PCORI Advisory Panels FAQs
        • Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
        • Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
        • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on Recruitment, Accrual, and Retention
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on the Standardization of Complex Concepts and their Terminology
        • Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
        • Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
        • Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
        • Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
      • Become a PCORI Ambassador
        • History of the Ambassador Program
        • About Ambassadors
        • Who are PCORI’s Ambassadors?
          • PCORI Individual Ambassadors
          • PCORI Organizational Ambassadors
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Northeast Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: South Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Midwest Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Western Region
        • Ambassador Program Interest Form
      • Provide Input
        • Past Opportunities to Provide Input
          • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment
            • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment Submissions
          • Comment on the Proposed New and Revised Methodology Standards
          • Peer Review Process Comments
      • Suggest a Patient-Centered Research Question
        • How to Write a Research Question
      • Participate in PCORI Events
        • PCORI in Practice
  • Funding Opportunities
    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
      • FAQs for Applicants
      • Glossary
      • Have a Question?
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review Process
      • Merit Review Criteria
      • Merit Reviewer Resources
        • Merit Review Timeline
        • Reviewer Training
        • Meet Our Reviewers
        • Reviewer FAQs
    • Research Support Funding Opportunities
      • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Review Process
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards FAQs
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Recently Funded Projects
      • Pipeline to Proposal Awards
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Program Offices
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Three-Tiered Program
      • PCORnet Infrastructure Awards
      • The PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge
        • 2014 PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge - Runners Up
          • Judges for PCORI 2014 Challenge
        • PCORI Challenge Initiative - 2013
          • Judges for PCORI 2013 Challenge
      • Research Support Funding
    • Awardee Resources
      • Closed PCORI Funding Announcements
      • Post-Award FAQs
  • Meetings & Events
    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

Multiple Sclerosis Research Network Builds on Patient Input

Date: 
July 19, 2016
Topics: 
Research,
PCORnet Blogs,
Guest Blogs

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a widespread, disabling neurological condition. In fact, it’s the most common disabling condition among adults between 20 and 40 years old. The World Health Organization estimates that MS affects more than 400,000 people in the United States, and nearly 200 are diagnosed with MS each week. People with MS can develop a wide variety of symptoms, including vision loss, fatigue, pain, and loss of coordination.

Patients' voices play an important role in the iConquerMS network. (Video provided by iConquerMS)

Unfortunately, clinicians have a hard time predicting which patients will experience mild symptoms and which will see their health deteriorate dramatically, or who will benefit from which of the more than a dozen drugs currently available. To help answer those questions, MS patients can get involved in patient-centered clinical research projects. PCORI has funded a dozen projects about MS or research methods that may be applied to MS studies (see box, PCORI’s Multiple Sclerosis Focus), and just announced $19.6 million in funding for four comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) studies assessing various therapies for multiple sclerosis.

One project already under way is the Multiple Sclerosis Patient-Powered Research Network (MS-PPRN), also called iConquerMS. This network serves as a bridge between people who have MS and researchers, helping patients ensure that research addresses their most pressing questions in order to improve care and outcomes. The network is part of PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, a PCORI initiative to harness the power of data and unique partnerships to conduct important health research faster, more efficiently, and at lower cost than was previously possible.

iConquerMS is committed to engaging patients as partners with researchers; this commitment is emblematic of PCORI’s overall approach to CER. To find out more about the network, PCORI spoke with Robert McBurney, BSc, PhD, co-principal investigator of iConquerMS and president and CEO of the Accelerated Cure Project, and Laura Kolaczkowski, the iConquerMS patient co-principal investigator.

PCORI's Multiple Sclerosis Focus

PCORI has funded a dozen patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research studies and methods projects that directly or indirectly address multiple sclerosis. This funding includes nearly $20 million for four new studies on therapies for MS.

Two of those studies will compare the pros and cons of drugs to reduce MS attacks or slow the disease's progression. A third will evaluate medications used to treat fatigue, a common problem for people with MS. The fourth will assess whether patients with MS in rural and low-income areas benefit as much from rehabilitation therapies provided via telehealth as they do from treatment in a clinic.

Previously awarded projects include a pilot study that developed and tested a digital tool that can display health information for use by patients with MS and clinicians. (Read more about this project in Tablet Tool Harnesses Data from Many Patients for Individual Choices.)

For more information, see a list of projects, recently approved or in progress, focused on either MS or research methods that may be applied to MS studies.

How did you get involved with iConquerMS?

Laura Kolaczkowski: I was diagnosed with MS in 2008 when I was 54, but looking back, I see I was experiencing symptoms of MS for probably 15 to 20 years before that. I was good at ignoring the symptoms, thinking I was just fatigued or experiencing balance issues because I was doing too much. I was finally diagnosed after telling my doctor about having a numb leg.

I can tell you exactly where I was standing when I got the phone call with my MS diagnosis. I was upset. I wanted to do everything I could to improve my odds. It sent me on a search for answers.

I started looking for information about the disease by connecting with others in the MS community online. Being an informed patient was important in my own care. Then I started thinking about how all this information sharing was causing a shift in how other people communicate with their own care providers. This sparked my interest in MS research and I became active with PCORI.

I became involved with Accelerated Cure Project’s research as a study subject, and when I heard they were applying for PCORnet funding, I offered to help provide the patient perspective.

Robert McBurney: My organization’s mission is to accelerate research in MS, essentially by being like the open source movement in software. What researchers needed were resources that could be accessed by the entire research community in a facile way and inexpensively. Accelerated Cure Project built a biorepository with patient samples such as blood and DNA, along with a lot of data contributed by people with MS and others.

When the call went out from PCORI for awards to create a patient network, the concept of patient-powered research really resonated with our organization. PCORnet is the logical extension of our clinic-based sample and data collection. iConquerMS allows us to collect very large amounts of information about people with MS who join—not only their health data but their ideas for research. Right now, we have about 3,000 registered participants. We’re creating this patient network to transform the way that research is conducted.

How does PCORnet’s approach help with MS disease research?

Robert McBurney: We are getting requests to use our network for research quite frequently—we had two last week. Four funded research studies are going on now, and more are pending funding decisions. [With patients’ medical information out there in electronic records, researchers can find out anything and everything about our data except what we as the people living with a chronic disease might think. -- Laura Kolaczkowski]

Our PCORnet network accelerates research because researchers don’t have to build the data infrastructure or collect the baseline data—we already have those. They just need to use our data that are relevant to their question, and they can use our network to efficiently collect additional data.

People with MS tell us they want to know their prognosis, and also what they can do today to affect their health. Then we can reach out to researchers with questions that are most of interest to people with MS. It changes the whole paradigm for conducting research.

Laura Kolaczkowski: With patients’ medical information out there in electronic records, researchers can find out anything and everything about our data except what we as the people living with a chronic disease might think. PCORnet provides the framework to ask that question. That personal puzzle piece is what makes sure the right research questions are propelling MS research.

With patients’ medical information out there in electronic records, researchers can find out anything and everything about our data except what we as the people living with a chronic disease might think. ... That personal puzzle piece is what makes sure the right research questions are propelling MS research.

Laura Kolaczkowski

If you could have any research question answered, what would it be?

Robert McBurney: As a researcher, I have so many questions. It'd be great to get a sense of how many types of MS are out there. There are 13 or 14 drugs, but physicians have very little evidence on how to optimize treatment. We want to get the right treatment option to the right patient at the right time. (See related article, A Multifaceted Disease Requires a Patient-Centered Response.)

Laura Kolaczkowski: I’d like to know what will happen to me tomorrow, and what can give me a chance for a better prognosis. And also, what can we do to improve the lives of people living with MS? We can make progress on answering these questions if people join us at iConquerMS.


The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily those of PCORI.

Comments

I , too, am a member of

Cherie C. Binns... July 26, 2016 1:58 pm

Permalink

I , too, am a member of iConquerMS and serve on the research committee there. Subsequently, I was chosen as a result of that work to be a member of PCORnet's Engagement Committee and additionally am a PCORI Ambassador. I am totally convinced that patient powered research is an absolute necessity in this age of electronic information availability. As an MS Certified nurse who is also living with the illness for the past 4 decades, I am committed to educating and empowering people to become active in their health care team and plan and to drive research that is important to them.

Thank you Robert and Laura for sharing.

  • reply

Dear Cherie, thank you very

PCORI July 28, 2016 11:02 am

Permalink

Dear Cherie, thank you very much for your kind comments and for sharing your feedback.

  • reply

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author(s): 
Headshot of Robert McBurney, BSc, PhD, Co-Principal Investigator for the iConquerMS PPRN

Robert McBurney, BSc, PhD

President, CEO, Accelerated Cure Project for Multiple Sclerosis
Headshot of Laura Kolaczkowski, Lead Patient Representative and Co-Principal Investigator for iConquerMS

Laura Kolaczkowski

Multiple Sclerosis Advocate, Writer & Researcher

Topics

Research
PCORnet Blogs
Guest Blogs

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Dissemination and Implementation
  • Peer Review
  • Research Spotlights
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • What We Mean by Engagement
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review Process
  • Research Support Funding Opportunities
  • Awardee Resources

Meetings & Events

July 18
Board of Governors Meeting
July 19
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in Research: Strategies for Initiating Research Partnerships
July 26
Understanding Key Evidence Gaps in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: A Stakeholder Workshop

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
info@pcori.org

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2017 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Credits | Help Center