Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Glossary
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Programs
      • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
      • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
      • Evaluation and Analysis
      • Engagement
      • Research Infrastructure
    • Governance
      • Board of Governors
      • Methodology Committee
      • Committees
        • Engagement, Dissemination, and Implementation Committee
        • Research Transformation Committee
        • Science Oversight Committee
        • Finance and Administration Committee
        • Executive Committee
        • Governance Committee
          • Executive Evaluation and Compensation Subcommittee
        • Scientific Publications Committee
        • Selection Committee
    • Financials and Reports
      • Our Funding
    • Procurement Opportunities
      • Operations Support Funding
      • Research Support Funding
      • Contracted Projects
    • Our Staff
      • Executive Team
      • Office of the Executive Director
        • Evaluation and Analysis
        • Research Infrastructure
      • Office of the General Counsel
      • Science
        • Office of the Chief Science Officer
        • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
        • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
        • Merit Review
        • Peer Review
        • Research Synthesis
      • Engagement
        • Communications
        • Dissemination and Implementation
        • Engagement Awards
        • Office of the Chief Engagement and Dissemination Officer
        • Public and Patient Engagement
        • Public Policy
        • Training
      • Operations
        • Office of the Chief Operations Officer
        • Administrative Services
        • Contracts Management and Administration
        • Finance
        • Human Resources
        • Information Technology
        • Procurement
  • Research & Results
    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Dissemination and Implementation
      • CME/CE Activities
      • Dissemination and Implementation Framework and Toolkit
    • Peer Review
      • Step-by-Step Instructions for Awardees: Peer Review of Draft Final Research Report
      • Peer Review FAQ
    • Research Spotlights
    • About Our Research
      • How We Select Research Topics
        • Generation and Prioritization of Topics for Funding Announcements
        • Topics in the Prioritization Pathway
      • Research We Support
        • National Priorities and Research Agenda
          • How We Developed our National Priorities and Research Agenda
            • Public Comments for PCORI’s National Priorities and Research Agenda
      • Collaborating with Other Research Funders
      • Research Methodology
        • PCORI Methodology Standards
          • Suggest a Topic Area for New Methodology Standards
        • The PCORI Methodology Report
          • Draft Methodology Report Public Comment Period
        • PCORI Methodology Standards and Report FAQ
        • Methodology Standards Academic Curriculum
          • Category 1: Standards for Formulating Research Questions
          • Category 2: Standards Associated with Patient-Centeredness
          • Category 3: Standards for Data Integrity and Rigorous Analyses
          • Category 4: Standards for Preventing and Handling Missing Data
          • Category 5: Standards for Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects
          • Category 6: Standards for Data Registries
          • Category 7: Data Networks as Research-Facilitating Structures
          • Category 8: Standards for Causal Inference Methods
          • Category 9: Standards for Adaptive and Bayesian Trial Designs
          • Category 10: Standards for Studies of Diagnostic Tests
          • Category 11: Standards for Systematic Reviews
        • Methodology Committee - Background
        • Methodology Committee - Workshops and Events
      • Evaluating Our Work
        • Planning Our Evaluation, Reporting the Results
        • PCORI Evaluation Group (PEG)
        • How We Evaluate Key Aspects of Our Work
        • Related Blog Posts
  • Engagement
    • What We Mean by Engagement
      • PCORI’s Stakeholders
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engage with Us
      • Voices of Engagement
        • Regina Greer-Smith
        • Kimberly Jinnett
        • Toya Burton
        • David White
        • David Hahn
        • Rebekah Angove
        • Neely Williams
        • Peter W. Thomas
        • Megan O'Boyle
        • Stephanie Buxhoeveden
      • Become a Merit Reviewer
        • PCORI Stakeholder Reviewer Communities
        • Reviewer Qualifications
        • Reviewer Responsibilities
      • Become a Peer Reviewer
      • Join an Advisory Panel
        • Advisory Panel Openings
        • PCORI Advisory Panels FAQs
        • Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
        • Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
        • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on Recruitment, Accrual, and Retention
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on the Standardization of Complex Concepts and their Terminology
        • Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
        • Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
        • Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
        • Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
      • Become a PCORI Ambassador
        • History of the Ambassador Program
        • About Ambassadors
        • Who are PCORI’s Ambassadors?
          • PCORI Individual Ambassadors
          • PCORI Organizational Ambassadors
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Northeast Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: South Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Midwest Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Western Region
        • Ambassador Program Interest Form
      • Provide Input
        • Past Opportunities to Provide Input
          • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment
            • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment Submissions
          • Comment on the Proposed New and Revised Methodology Standards
          • Peer Review Process Comments
      • Suggest a Patient-Centered Research Question
        • How to Write a Research Question
      • Participate in PCORI Events
        • PCORI in Practice
  • Funding Opportunities
    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
      • FAQs for Applicants
      • Glossary
      • Have a Question?
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review Process
      • Merit Review Criteria
      • Merit Reviewer Resources
        • Merit Review Timeline
        • Reviewer Training
        • Meet Our Reviewers
        • Reviewer FAQs
    • Research Support Funding Opportunities
      • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Review Process
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards FAQs
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Recently Funded Projects
      • Pipeline to Proposal Awards
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Program Offices
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Three-Tiered Program
      • PCORnet Infrastructure Awards
      • The PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge
        • 2014 PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge - Runners Up
          • Judges for PCORI 2014 Challenge
        • PCORI Challenge Initiative - 2013
          • Judges for PCORI 2013 Challenge
      • Research Support Funding
    • Awardee Resources
      • Closed PCORI Funding Announcements
      • Post-Award FAQs
  • Meetings & Events
    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

Patient Perspectives on Arthritis Research

Date: 
May 23, 2017
Topics: 
Research,
Guest Blogs

Nearly one-quarter of American adults have been told by a doctor that they have arthritis. The lived expertise of people with the condition informs PCORI research on arthritis, which includes patients at every step of the way—from topic generation to study design and conduct to dissemination of results among patients and clinicians who can use them to make healthcare decisions.

A woman with a painful wrist being examined by a medical professional.

The Arthritis Foundation takes a similar view of patient engagement, bringing scientific experts and clinicians together with people who have arthritis and their families. The foundation also has committed to funding research to develop more effective arthritis treatments.

PCORI and the Arthritis Foundation work in partnership to provide leadership in comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) on arthritis. This is research that compares treatments to learn which are the most effective for which patients.

The two organizations will be hosting a Facebook Live event on May 30 at 1 pm Eastern. Join us to get answers to your questions about patient-centered arthritis research.

Facebook Live & Periscope: The Need for Patient-Centered Arthritis Research, May 30, 1pm ET

In observance of National Arthritis Awareness Month, two Arthritis Foundation members—an individual with rheumatoid arthritis and a mother of two children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis—shared their experiences with us.

What is it like for you and your family to live with the disease?

Cindy Kimberly: Most people, thankfully, will never know what it’s like to live with pain daily: to have pain rob you of your sleep and the ability to do the things you love with your family; to have had to recover from over 15 surgeries on 20-plus sites in your body.

When I was younger, I wasn’t able to attend high school for two years because my joints wouldn’t allow me to carry all my books, open a locker, and get to my next class in time.

Later, it took some effort to get off all my meds to try to become pregnant. I had a great pregnancy and delivered a perfectly healthy son, but I experienced a significant flare after delivery. It caused difficulties even with changing diapers and made me fearful that I would drop my 6-pound baby.

Even if you find the magic bullet that alleviates swelling and pain, there’s still the fatigue. And don’t forget about the side effects that wreak havoc on your body.

There is a silver lining! Now is the best time ever to be diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis because of all the drugs available. Also, living with chronic pain and fatigue makes you truly appreciate the good days, for they are a gift.

To me, research now means hope, and I am thrilled that my girls’ medical data can help research improve care for all kids who are affected by this disease.

Anjie Vago

Anjie Vago: I have two children with this disease. It has changed our family’s life in every way imaginable. It demands a lot of our time because of doctors’ appointments and all the learning that needs to occur.

As a parent, I’ve had to learn to speak up, be assertive, and advocate for my kids. My girls have had to find their voices in a way most kids don’t have to. They have a vocabulary that would stump many very educated adults.

Our perspective on life has also changed dramatically. We’ve learned to be a lot more flexible because this disease is unpredictable.

I think we’ve also become more compassionate, knowing that things aren’t always what they seem on the surface. Sometimes that means reaching out to another parent or child who is struggling, and sometimes that means volunteering with organizations like the Arthritis Foundation.

PCORI’s Arthritis Focus

PCORI has invested $50 million in 19 patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness studies and methods projects related to arthritis. One project focuses on African Americans with osteoarthritis in a hip or knee and compares outcomes among those trained to cope with pain and those who haven’t yet received the training. Another project compares the results of physical therapy and an online exercise training program for people with osteoarthritis affecting a knee.

There are also three arthritis-focused networks within PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, which harnesses the power of large amounts of electronic health information and unique partnerships among patients, clinicians, and others to make clinical research faster and less expensive. Anjie Vago is associated with one of these networks, Patients, Advocates, and Rheumatology Teams Network for Research and Service Consortium (PARTNERS), for which the Arthritis Foundation is one of the partnering organizations.

For more information, see our arthritis fact sheet and a list of all PCORI research and other projects related to arthritis.

Have you had firsthand experience with research?

Cindy Kimberly: In the mid-90s, my rheumatologist suggested I join a double-blind clinical trial for a biologic drug. I was in my mid 30s, and I’d already been suffering with rheumatoid arthritis since I was 15 and had had multiple joint replacement surgeries. Nothing was helping. I had nothing to lose!

The treatment made me feel better, but it caused some side effects. Ultimately, I decided against taking it. This is common for arthritis patients. You have to weigh the benefit of treatment against the possibility of side effects.

Anjie Vago: Almost two years ago, I became the parent representative from our hospital to the Pediatric Rheumatology Care and Outcomes Improvement Network (PR-COIN), a network of clinicians and families working to transform care for children with rheumatic conditions. PR-COIN is part of PARTNERS, one of the networks that make up PCORnet, PCORI’s clinical research network. I joined PR-COIN’s research subcommittee. It has been incredibly helpful to learn more about how research works, what constitutes good research, and how to read research studies. This has had a direct impact on our family’s level of understanding of juvenile arthritis and its treatment.

To me, research now means hope, and I am thrilled that my girls’ medical data can help research improve care for all kids who are affected by this disease.

Do you expect comparative effectiveness research to help you make decisions?

Cindy Kimberly: Comparative effectiveness research is overdue. There have been many times that my rheumatologist and I made a decision based on his advice, because we had no literature available on a new drug. There have been other times when I’ve been given so much literature that it’s almost impossible to make my way through it all.

Having an independent funder like PCORI is really critical to producing unbiased and patient-centered CER.

Anjie Vago: We’ve always been given a lot of information when making treatment decisions; our rheumatologists have been great in that area!

I am thankful for the tools that have been, and are being, developed as a result of this type of research to aid parents and patients in decision making. This research is improving the quality of care and the relationships between providers and patients.

Headshot of Guy Eakin, PHD, Senior Vice President, Scientific Strategy, Arthritis FoundationArthritis can rob people of their lives and is a leading cause of disability. The Arthritis Foundation is committed to finding a cure through our research efforts and partnerships with groups like PCORI. We are also providing the arthritis community with a place to connect and become empowered to live a better life. That’s why we’re here, to champion the fight for people with arthritis.

Guy Eakin, PhD
Senior Vice President, Scientific Strategy, ​Arthritis Foundation

The views expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of PCORI.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author(s): 
Headshot of Cindy Kimberly

Cindy Kimberly

Headshot of Anjie Vago

Anjie Vago

Topics

Research
Guest Blogs

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Dissemination and Implementation
  • Peer Review
  • Research Spotlights
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • What We Mean by Engagement
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review Process
  • Research Support Funding Opportunities
  • Awardee Resources

Meetings & Events

July 17
PCORI Online LOI Submission Webinar for Cycle 2 2017 Applicants
July 18
Board of Governors Meeting
July 19
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in Research: Strategies for Initiating Research Partnerships

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
info@pcori.org

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2017 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Credits | Help Center