Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Glossary
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Programs
      • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
      • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
      • Evaluation and Analysis
      • Engagement
      • Research Infrastructure
    • Governance
      • Board of Governors
      • Methodology Committee
      • Committees
        • Engagement, Dissemination, and Implementation Committee
        • Research Transformation Committee
        • Science Oversight Committee
        • Finance and Administration Committee
        • Executive Committee
        • Governance Committee
          • Executive Evaluation and Compensation Subcommittee
        • Scientific Publications Committee
        • Selection Committee
    • Financials and Reports
      • Our Funding
    • Procurement Opportunities
      • Operations Support Funding
      • Research Support Funding
      • Contracted Projects
    • Our Staff
      • Executive Team
      • Office of the Executive Director
        • Evaluation and Analysis
        • Research Infrastructure
      • Office of the General Counsel
      • Science
        • Office of the Chief Science Officer
        • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
        • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
        • Merit Review
        • Peer Review
        • Research Synthesis
      • Engagement
        • Communications
        • Dissemination and Implementation
        • Engagement Awards
        • Office of the Chief Engagement and Dissemination Officer
        • Public and Patient Engagement
        • Public Policy
        • Training
      • Operations
        • Office of the Chief Operations Officer
        • Administrative Services
        • Contracts Management and Administration
        • Finance
        • Human Resources
        • Information Technology
        • Procurement
  • Research & Results
    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Dissemination and Implementation
      • CME/CE Activities
      • Dissemination and Implementation Framework and Toolkit
    • Peer Review
      • Step-by-Step Instructions for Awardees: Peer Review of Draft Final Research Report
      • Peer Review FAQ
    • Research Spotlights
    • About Our Research
      • How We Select Research Topics
        • Generation and Prioritization of Topics for Funding Announcements
        • Topics in the Prioritization Pathway
      • Research We Support
        • National Priorities and Research Agenda
          • How We Developed our National Priorities and Research Agenda
            • Public Comments for PCORI’s National Priorities and Research Agenda
      • Collaborating with Other Research Funders
      • Research Methodology
        • PCORI Methodology Standards
          • Suggest a Topic Area for New Methodology Standards
        • The PCORI Methodology Report
          • Draft Methodology Report Public Comment Period
        • PCORI Methodology Standards and Report FAQ
        • Methodology Standards Academic Curriculum
          • Category 1: Standards for Formulating Research Questions
          • Category 2: Standards Associated with Patient-Centeredness
          • Category 3: Standards for Data Integrity and Rigorous Analyses
          • Category 4: Standards for Preventing and Handling Missing Data
          • Category 5: Standards for Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects
          • Category 6: Standards for Data Registries
          • Category 7: Data Networks as Research-Facilitating Structures
          • Category 8: Standards for Causal Inference Methods
          • Category 9: Standards for Adaptive and Bayesian Trial Designs
          • Category 10: Standards for Studies of Diagnostic Tests
          • Category 11: Standards for Systematic Reviews
        • Methodology Committee - Background
        • Methodology Committee - Workshops and Events
      • Evaluating Our Work
        • Planning Our Evaluation, Reporting the Results
        • PCORI Evaluation Group (PEG)
        • How We Evaluate Key Aspects of Our Work
        • Related Blog Posts
  • Engagement
    • What We Mean by Engagement
      • PCORI’s Stakeholders
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engage with Us
      • Voices of Engagement
        • David White
        • Elizabeth Cox
        • Regina Greer-Smith
        • Kimberly Jinnett
        • Toya Burton
        • David Hahn
        • Rebekah Angove
        • Neely Williams
        • Peter W. Thomas
        • Megan O'Boyle
        • Stephanie Buxhoeveden
      • Become a Merit Reviewer
        • PCORI Stakeholder Reviewer Communities
        • Reviewer Qualifications
        • Reviewer Responsibilities
      • Become a Peer Reviewer
      • Join an Advisory Panel
        • Advisory Panel Openings
        • PCORI Advisory Panels FAQs
        • Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
        • Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
        • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on Recruitment, Accrual, and Retention
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on the Standardization of Complex Concepts and their Terminology
        • Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
        • Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
        • Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
        • Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
      • Become a PCORI Ambassador
        • History of the Ambassador Program
        • About Ambassadors
        • Who are PCORI’s Ambassadors?
          • PCORI Individual Ambassadors
          • PCORI Organizational Ambassadors
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Northeast Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: South Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Midwest Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Western Region
        • Ambassador Program Interest Form
      • Provide Input
        • Past Opportunities to Provide Input
          • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment
            • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment Submissions
          • Comment on the Proposed New and Revised Methodology Standards
          • Peer Review Process Comments
      • Suggest a Patient-Centered Research Question
        • How to Write a Research Question
      • Participate in PCORI Events
        • PCORI in Practice
  • Funding Opportunities
    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
      • FAQs for Applicants
      • Glossary
      • Have a Question?
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review Process
      • Merit Review Criteria
      • Merit Reviewer Resources
        • Merit Review Timeline
        • Reviewer Training
        • Meet Our Reviewers
        • Reviewer FAQs
    • Research Support Funding Opportunities
      • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Review Process
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards FAQs
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Recently Funded Projects
      • Pipeline to Proposal Awards
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Program Offices
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Three-Tiered Program
      • PCORnet Infrastructure Awards
      • The PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge
        • 2014 PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge - Runners Up
          • Judges for PCORI 2014 Challenge
        • PCORI Challenge Initiative - 2013
          • Judges for PCORI 2013 Challenge
      • Research Support Funding
    • Awardee Resources
      • Closed PCORI Funding Announcements
      • Post-Award FAQs
  • Meetings & Events
    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

You are here

  • Funding Opportunities
  • Addressing Disparities - Cycle 1 2017

Addressing Disparities - Cycle 1 2017

Letters of Intent for this PCORI funding announcement were due Tuesday, February 14, 2017.
Those selected to submit a full application were notified by Wednesday, March 15, 2017.
Full applications were due Wednesday, May 17, 2017, by 5:00 p.m. (ET)

Table of Contents

  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Background
  • Research of Interest
  • Targeted Populations
  • Priority Areas
  • Community Health Worker and Navigator Projects

Summary

In this PCORI Funding Announcement (PFA), we seek to fund comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) studies that evaluate and compare interventions to reduce or eliminate disparities in health and healthcare. Studies in the Addressing Disparities Program should focus on overcoming barriers that may disproportionately affect the outcomes of specific groups of patients or should identify best practices for reducing disparities.

Funds Available: $8 million

Maximum Project Budget (Total Direct Costs): $1.5 million

Maximum Research Project Period: Three years

Return to the Broad PCORI Funding Announcements page for key dates.

Introduction

The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) invites applications for comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) designed to evaluate interventions intended to reduce or eliminate disparities in health and healthcare. Patients and other stakeholders often lack the appropriate evidence required to make the best choices regarding prevention, screening, diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment. Applications to the Addressing Disparities Program should focus on overcoming barriers that may disproportionately affect health outcomes or focus on identifying best practices for reducing disparities in target populations (racial and ethnic minority groups; low-income groups; residents of rural areas; individuals with special healthcare needs, including individuals with disabilities; patients with low health literacy, numeracy, or limited English proficiency; and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender [LGBT] persons).

Background

The health disparities literature has largely been devoted to describing disparities, including identifying their potential sources and drivers. Previous research has identified pervasive disparities in access to high-quality healthcare and worse health outcomes for specific populations across multiple conditions and multiple settings—outcomes that are based on race or ethnicity, gender, geographic location, socioeconomic status, disability, and other factors. These disparities have been well-documented. Thus, PCORI’s Addressing Disparities Program is seeking applications that compare evidence-based interventions to improve health outcomes and reduce disparities for target populations. (See the section below on Targeted Populations.)

Back to Top

Research of Interest

PCORI seeks to fund studies that provide evidence to help guide decisions about how to eliminate disparities in health and healthcare, as well as how to ensure that people receive care according to their needs and have the opportunity to achieve the best-possible health outcomes.

The Addressing Disparities Program is interested in funding CER of evidence-based interventions aimed at reducing and eliminating disparities in health and healthcare. Interventions to reduce persistent disparities have been understudied and are multifactorial, complex, and context-specific. Often, evidence-based interventions have been shown to be effective in the general population, but lack evidence for effectiveness in populations at risk for disparities. The Addressing Disparities Program is interested in studies that tailor and test these types of interventions in these populations.

PCORI’s Addressing Disparities Program seeks to fund investigator-initiated research that:

  • Compares evidence-based interventions to reduce or eliminate disparities in patient-centered outcomes (PCOs), including health, healthcare, and patient-reported outcomes—e.g., by accounting for possible differences at the patient, provider, or systems level. We are interested in research to determine which interventions can be most effective for eliminating disparities in outcomes.
  • Compares benefits and risks of treatment, diagnostic, prevention, or service options, with a focus on eliminating disparities.
  • Compares and identifies practices for tailoring evidence-based interventions to patient populations at risk for disparities.

PCORI strongly encourages applicants to review the funded research on our website to ensure that their proposed research is not duplicative of projects we have already funded.

Back to Top

Targeted Populations

PCORI’s Addressing Disparities Program is interested in studies focusing on previously understudied populations for whom effectiveness information is needed. Proposed research must focus on at least one of the following groups:

  • Racial and ethnic minority groups
  • Low-income groups
  • Residents of rural areas
  • Individuals with special healthcare needs, including individuals with disabilities
  • Patients with low health literacy, numeracy, or limited English proficiency
  • LGBT persons

Back to Top

Priority Areas

The Addressing Disparities Program is interested in applications that include team-based care or strategies to enhance family and caregiver involvement in patient care to reduce disparities and improve patient-centered and clinical outcomes. The Addressing Disparities Program is also interested in funding CER studies that focus on:

  • Interventions to address disparities in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention and treatment
  • Interventions to reduce sleep disorder disparities among racial and ethnic minorities
  • Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments for Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia
  • Interventions to improve communication between clinicians and people with disabilities

Applications that cover any of these high-priority areas must also focus on one or more of the following Addressing Disparities target populations: racial and ethnic minority groups; low-income groups; residents of rural areas; individuals with special healthcare needs, including individuals with disabilities; patients with low health literacy, numeracy, or limited English proficiency; and LGBT persons.

Back to Top

Community Health Worker and Navigator Projects

The Addressing Disparities Program has funded many projects focusing on community health worker and navigator interventions. Applications aiming to study these types of interventions must focus on one of the following areas, which are based on existing evidence gaps:

  • Comparing different community health worker and patient navigator program models, worker functions, training and certification levels, and implementation approaches across different settings, conditions, and populations[1]
  • Examining the integration of community health workers and patient navigators into the care team, determining specifically the organizational strategies and components that are essential to well-functioning teams and the factors that increase acceptance by care teams[2]

Applications that propose research focusing on community health workers or navigators as a primary component of interventions being studied will undergo substantial scrutiny to ensure that the studies do not overlap significantly with previously funded studies or concurrent applications, and that they fill a gap within the program’s portfolio. PCORI encourages applicants to review the current portfolio to avoid redundancy with funded projects.

Back to Top


[1] Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. [2013]. A review of program evolution, evidence on effectiveness and value, and status of workforce development in New England. Retrieved April 8, 2015 from Comparative Effectiveness Public Advisory Council: http://cepac.icer-review.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CHW-Draft-Report-05-24-13-MASTER1.pdf.

[2] McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Bravata DM, et al. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 7: Care Coordination). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007 Jun. (Technical Reviews, No. 9.7.) 4, Review of Systematic Reviews of Care Coordination Interventions. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44016/.

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Dissemination and Implementation
  • Peer Review
  • Research Spotlights
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • What We Mean by Engagement
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review Process
  • Research Support Funding Opportunities
  • Awardee Resources

Meetings & Events

July 17
PCORI Online LOI Submission Webinar for Cycle 2 2017 Applicants
July 18
Board of Governors Meeting
July 19
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in Research: Strategies for Initiating Research Partnerships

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
info@pcori.org

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2017 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Credits | Help Center