Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Glossary
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Programs
      • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
      • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
      • Evaluation and Analysis
      • Engagement
      • Research Infrastructure
    • Governance
      • Board of Governors
      • Methodology Committee
      • Committees
        • Engagement, Dissemination, and Implementation Committee
        • Research Transformation Committee
        • Science Oversight Committee
        • Finance and Administration Committee
        • Executive Committee
        • Governance Committee
          • Executive Evaluation and Compensation Subcommittee
        • Scientific Publications Committee
        • Selection Committee
    • Financials and Reports
      • Our Funding
    • Procurement Opportunities
      • Operations Support Funding
      • Research Support Funding
      • Contracted Projects
    • Our Staff
      • Executive Team
      • Office of the Executive Director
        • Evaluation and Analysis
        • Research Infrastructure
      • Office of the General Counsel
      • Science
        • Office of the Chief Science Officer
        • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
        • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
        • Merit Review
        • Peer Review
        • Research Synthesis
      • Engagement
        • Communications
        • Dissemination and Implementation
        • Engagement Awards
        • Office of the Chief Engagement and Dissemination Officer
        • Public and Patient Engagement
        • Public Policy
        • Training
      • Operations
        • Office of the Chief Operations Officer
        • Administrative Services
        • Contracts Management and Administration
        • Finance
        • Human Resources
        • Information Technology
        • Procurement
  • Research & Results
    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Dissemination and Implementation
      • CME/CE Activities
      • Dissemination and Implementation Framework and Toolkit
    • Peer Review
      • Step-by-Step Instructions for Awardees: Peer Review of Draft Final Research Report
      • Peer Review FAQ
    • Research Spotlights
    • About Our Research
      • How We Select Research Topics
        • Generation and Prioritization of Topics for Funding Announcements
        • Topics in the Prioritization Pathway
      • Research We Support
        • National Priorities and Research Agenda
          • How We Developed our National Priorities and Research Agenda
            • Public Comments for PCORI’s National Priorities and Research Agenda
      • Collaborating with Other Research Funders
      • Research Methodology
        • PCORI Methodology Standards
          • Suggest a Topic Area for New Methodology Standards
        • The PCORI Methodology Report
          • Draft Methodology Report Public Comment Period
        • PCORI Methodology Standards and Report FAQ
        • Methodology Standards Academic Curriculum
          • Category 1: Standards for Formulating Research Questions
          • Category 2: Standards Associated with Patient-Centeredness
          • Category 3: Standards for Data Integrity and Rigorous Analyses
          • Category 4: Standards for Preventing and Handling Missing Data
          • Category 5: Standards for Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects
          • Category 6: Standards for Data Registries
          • Category 7: Data Networks as Research-Facilitating Structures
          • Category 8: Standards for Causal Inference Methods
          • Category 9: Standards for Adaptive and Bayesian Trial Designs
          • Category 10: Standards for Studies of Diagnostic Tests
          • Category 11: Standards for Systematic Reviews
        • Methodology Committee - Background
        • Methodology Committee - Workshops and Events
      • Evaluating Our Work
        • Planning Our Evaluation, Reporting the Results
        • PCORI Evaluation Group (PEG)
        • How We Evaluate Key Aspects of Our Work
        • Related Blog Posts
  • Engagement
    • What We Mean by Engagement
      • PCORI’s Stakeholders
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engage with Us
      • Voices of Engagement
        • David White
        • Elizabeth Cox
        • Regina Greer-Smith
        • Kimberly Jinnett
        • Toya Burton
        • David Hahn
        • Rebekah Angove
        • Neely Williams
        • Peter W. Thomas
        • Megan O'Boyle
        • Stephanie Buxhoeveden
      • Become a Merit Reviewer
        • PCORI Stakeholder Reviewer Communities
        • Reviewer Qualifications
        • Reviewer Responsibilities
      • Become a Peer Reviewer
      • Join an Advisory Panel
        • Advisory Panel Openings
        • PCORI Advisory Panels FAQs
        • Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
        • Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
        • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on Recruitment, Accrual, and Retention
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on the Standardization of Complex Concepts and their Terminology
        • Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
        • Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
        • Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
        • Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
      • Become a PCORI Ambassador
        • History of the Ambassador Program
        • About Ambassadors
        • Who are PCORI’s Ambassadors?
          • PCORI Individual Ambassadors
          • PCORI Organizational Ambassadors
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Northeast Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: South Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Midwest Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Western Region
        • Ambassador Program Interest Form
      • Provide Input
        • Past Opportunities to Provide Input
          • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment
            • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment Submissions
          • Comment on the Proposed New and Revised Methodology Standards
          • Peer Review Process Comments
      • Suggest a Patient-Centered Research Question
        • How to Write a Research Question
      • Participate in PCORI Events
        • PCORI in Practice
  • Funding Opportunities
    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
      • FAQs for Applicants
      • Glossary
      • Have a Question?
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review Process
      • Merit Review Criteria
      • Merit Reviewer Resources
        • Merit Review Timeline
        • Reviewer Training
        • Meet Our Reviewers
        • Reviewer FAQs
    • Research Support Funding Opportunities
      • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Review Process
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards FAQs
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Recently Funded Projects
      • Pipeline to Proposal Awards
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Program Offices
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Three-Tiered Program
      • PCORnet Infrastructure Awards
      • The PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge
        • 2014 PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge - Runners Up
          • Judges for PCORI 2014 Challenge
        • PCORI Challenge Initiative - 2013
          • Judges for PCORI 2013 Challenge
      • Research Support Funding
    • Awardee Resources
      • Closed PCORI Funding Announcements
      • Post-Award FAQs
  • Meetings & Events
    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

You are here

  • Pilot Project: Creating an App That H...

« See all projects with results posted

Pilot Project: Creating an App That Helps Stroke Survivors and Their Caregivers

This project has results available

Public Abstract

Public Abstract

PCORI funded the Pilot Projects to explore how to conduct and use patient-centered outcomes research in ways that can better serve patients and the healthcare community. Learn more.

Background

People have been using mobile devices more and more to help with health care. Stroke survivors often need to keep track of many things to maintain and improve their health. Mobile apps could help stroke survivors and their caregivers manage their health and health care.

Project Purpose

The researchers wanted to learn

  • How stroke survivors and caregivers feel about apps
  • What types of things they want apps to do
  • What things make apps easy or hard to use

Methods

Using information from focus groups and interviews with stroke survivors and caregivers, the researchers developed a survey about what features and content might be useful in an app for stroke survivors.

The researchers sent the survey to 11.720 stroke survivors and caregivers. The team used the survey results to identify the app features that people thought would help stroke survivors take care of their health. They then built an app with these features and asked seven stroke survivors to test it.

Findings

The team received survey responses from 1,221 stroke survivors and 396 caregivers.

Stroke survivors and caregivers said they wanted an app to help them

  • Schedule doctor appointments
  • Remember when to take their medicine
  • Keep track of their blood pressure
  • Finds local resources to help them take care of their health

Stroke survivors but not caregivers said they wanted an app to help them track fitness and diet as well as communicate with others.

Older survivors were more concerned than younger people about getting trustworthy information. Older survivors and their caregivers were less likely to say that an app would be useful. Younger survivors were more interested than older people in finding stroke support groups, and they wanted an app to help with stroke rehabilitation exercises—for example, physical therapy exercises.

Based on these findings, the researchers created an app they called ComeBackStrong. The app included features to help stroke survivors and caregivers

  • Schedule doctor appointments
  • Learn about local support groups
  • Get fitness and diet information
  • Find local resources to help them take care of their health
  • Provide reminders for taking medication

Stroke survivors who tested the app said reminders and alerts for medication were helpful. They suggested ways to make the app controls easier to use for people who may have trouble seeing or using the touch interface of a smartphone. They also gave feedback about making the app easier to navigate and customize.

Limitations

The app can be used only by people who have iPhones or Android phones. The app was tested by only seven people. If more people had been included in the testing, researchers might have learned about other ways the app could be improved.

Conclusions

The researchers created the ComeBackStrong app based on needs identified by stroke survivors and their caregivers.

Technical Abstract

Technical Abstract 

PCORI funded the Pilot Projects to explore how to conduct and use patient-centered outcomes research in ways that can better serve patients and the healthcare community. Learn more.

Background

Mobile technology has been entering the medical field at a rapid pace. However, it is underutilized in patient-centered health care. Mobile applications (apps) may allow stroke survivors and caregivers to actively participate in risk factor management.

Project Purpose

The objective of the Mobile Apps (MAPPS): Patient and Caregiver Attitudes, Behaviors, and Knowledge project was to investigate how stroke survivors and caregivers feel about apps, determine what they consider to be desired features in apps, and identify any usability issues of apps to facilitate post-stroke care and needs.

Methods (participants, interventions, outcomes, settings; data sources, data analysis)

Study Design

A nationwide population-based survey consisting of 17 questions was distributed to 11,720 stroke survivors and caregivers via e-mail and postal mail. The survey was developed using formative focus groups in Brooklyn, NY and Centennial, CO. Qualitative information about current smartphone usage and interest in health-related apps was collected using focus groups and summative interviews. Stroke survivors conducted usability testing on the new app to make final improvements before the app was released and promoted to the public.

Participants, Interventions, Settings, and Outcomes

The study focused on stroke survivors and caregivers.

Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from a national survey, focus groups, and summative phone interviews. Outcomes of interest included current smartphone usage, interest in health-related apps, problems with existing mobile health applications, desired features and content, and user platform preferences. The goal of usability testing was to assess ease of use, ease of information input, and functionality.

Data Analysis

Throughout the project, the needs, attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors of stroke survivors and caregivers concerning mobile technology were investigated based on gender, age, race, and ethnicity using χ2. Research specialists analyzed and interpreted the data collected during the summative phone interviews and the national survey. Usability testing results and validity of responses were analyzed using an external company.

Findings

Researchers explored preferences by gender, race/ethnicity, age, and education using χ2.

A total of 1,221 stroke survivors and 396 caregivers responded to the survey. Survey results demonstrated that

  • Scheduling doctor/rehab appointments was the most preferred feature for survivors and caregivers of all ethnicities.
  • The capability to track doctor appointments, medication schedules, and blood pressure were the most favored features of a mobile app in both groups.
  • Stroke rehab exercise instructions were more often preferred as a feature by younger survivors, while older survivors were more interested in having an app that included trustworthy medical information.
  • The ability to find local stroke-related resources using a mobile app was preferred by the majority of caregivers and stroke survivors.
  • The ability to track fitness/diet was more desired by stroke survivors than caregivers. The ability for a mobile app to facilitate stroke survivors’ communication was highly favored by survivors while not considered useful by the majority of caregivers.

Building relevant apps requires feedback from users. The research team used feedback from stroke survivors and caregivers to identify the key features that they thought were necessary to build a stroke-dedicated app.

Stroke survivors who tested the app said reminders and alerts, including ones for medication, were helpful. They provided suggestions for ways to make the app controls easier to use for people who may have trouble seeing or using the touch features of a smartphone. They also gave feedback about ways to make the app easier to navigate and customize. 

Usability testing was conducted on iPhone and Android devices; the app (ComeBackStrong) is only available in the Apple and Google Play stores.

Conclusions

The ComeBackStrong mobile app was developed for stroke survivors based on their specific needs and concerns. Throughout the project, stroke survivors and caregivers (who were stratified by age, gender, and race/ethnicity) provided valuable data that allowed the research team to focus on the most important aspects of this mobile app. The results from the national survey suggested that there was a need for patient-centered mobile health apps in personal health management for stroke survivors and caregivers.

Project Details

Principal Investigator
Sharon Januchowski, RN ^
Project Status
Completed; Results posted
Project Title
Mobile Apps (MAPPS): Patient & Caregiver Attitudes, Behaviors, and Knowledge
Project Start Date
June 2012
Project End Date
June 2015
Organization
National Stroke Association
Year Awarded
2012
State
Colorado
Project Budget
$618,738
Study Registration Information
HSRP20133084

^ Amy K. Jensen, BA, was the original principal investigator for this project.

More on this Project

What Do Patients and Caregivers Want In Mobile Health Apps? Ask Them - A narrative on how researchers consult with patients and caregivers as a first step in developing new mobile tools for stroke survivors. 

VIDEO: Developing Mobile Apps for Stroke Survivors
Steven Levine and Dee Burton discuss some of the results of a preliminary survey they did to develop mobile apps for stroke survivors.

Page Last Updated: 
April 10, 2017
  • Top of Page

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Dissemination and Implementation
  • Peer Review
  • Research Spotlights
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • What We Mean by Engagement
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review Process
  • Research Support Funding Opportunities
  • Awardee Resources

Meetings & Events

July 18
Board of Governors Meeting
July 19
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in Research: Strategies for Initiating Research Partnerships
July 26
Understanding Key Evidence Gaps in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: A Stakeholder Workshop

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
info@pcori.org

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2017 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Credits | Help Center