Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Glossary
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Programs
      • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
      • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
      • Evaluation and Analysis
      • Engagement
      • Research Infrastructure
    • Governance
      • Board of Governors
      • Methodology Committee
      • Committees
        • Engagement, Dissemination, and Implementation Committee
        • Research Transformation Committee
        • Science Oversight Committee
        • Finance and Administration Committee
        • Executive Committee
        • Governance Committee
          • Executive Evaluation and Compensation Subcommittee
        • Scientific Publications Committee
        • Selection Committee
    • Financials and Reports
      • Our Funding
    • Procurement Opportunities
      • Operations Support Funding
      • Research Support Funding
      • Contracted Projects
    • Our Staff
      • Executive Team
      • Office of the Executive Director
        • Evaluation and Analysis
        • Research Infrastructure
      • Office of the General Counsel
      • Science
        • Office of the Chief Science Officer
        • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
        • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
        • Merit Review
        • Peer Review
        • Research Synthesis
      • Engagement
        • Communications
        • Dissemination and Implementation
        • Engagement Awards
        • Office of the Chief Engagement and Dissemination Officer
        • Public and Patient Engagement
        • Public Policy
        • Training
      • Operations
        • Office of the Chief Operations Officer
        • Administrative Services
        • Contracts Management and Administration
        • Finance
        • Human Resources
        • Information Technology
        • Procurement
  • Research & Results
    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Dissemination and Implementation
      • CME/CE Activities
      • Dissemination and Implementation Framework and Toolkit
    • Peer Review
      • Step-by-Step Instructions for Awardees: Peer Review of Draft Final Research Report
      • Peer Review FAQ
    • Research Spotlights
    • About Our Research
      • How We Select Research Topics
        • Generation and Prioritization of Topics for Funding Announcements
        • Topics in the Prioritization Pathway
      • Research We Support
        • National Priorities and Research Agenda
          • How We Developed our National Priorities and Research Agenda
            • Public Comments for PCORI’s National Priorities and Research Agenda
      • Collaborating with Other Research Funders
      • Research Methodology
        • PCORI Methodology Standards
          • Suggest a Topic Area for New Methodology Standards
        • The PCORI Methodology Report
          • Draft Methodology Report Public Comment Period
        • PCORI Methodology Standards and Report FAQ
        • Methodology Standards Academic Curriculum
          • Category 1: Standards for Formulating Research Questions
          • Category 2: Standards Associated with Patient-Centeredness
          • Category 3: Standards for Data Integrity and Rigorous Analyses
          • Category 4: Standards for Preventing and Handling Missing Data
          • Category 5: Standards for Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects
          • Category 6: Standards for Data Registries
          • Category 7: Data Networks as Research-Facilitating Structures
          • Category 8: Standards for Causal Inference Methods
          • Category 9: Standards for Adaptive and Bayesian Trial Designs
          • Category 10: Standards for Studies of Diagnostic Tests
          • Category 11: Standards for Systematic Reviews
        • Methodology Committee - Background
        • Methodology Committee - Workshops and Events
      • Evaluating Our Work
        • Planning Our Evaluation, Reporting the Results
        • PCORI Evaluation Group (PEG)
        • How We Evaluate Key Aspects of Our Work
        • Related Blog Posts
  • Engagement
    • What We Mean by Engagement
      • PCORI’s Stakeholders
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engage with Us
      • Voices of Engagement
        • David White
        • Elizabeth Cox
        • Regina Greer-Smith
        • Kimberly Jinnett
        • Toya Burton
        • David Hahn
        • Rebekah Angove
        • Neely Williams
        • Peter W. Thomas
        • Megan O'Boyle
        • Stephanie Buxhoeveden
        • Sergio Sanchez
      • Become a Merit Reviewer
        • PCORI Stakeholder Reviewer Communities
        • Reviewer Qualifications
        • Reviewer Responsibilities
      • Become a Peer Reviewer
      • Join an Advisory Panel
        • Advisory Panel Openings
        • PCORI Advisory Panels FAQs
        • Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
        • Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
        • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on Recruitment, Accrual, and Retention
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on the Standardization of Complex Concepts and their Terminology
        • Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
        • Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
        • Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
        • Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
      • Become a PCORI Ambassador
        • History of the Ambassador Program
        • About Ambassadors
        • Who are PCORI’s Ambassadors?
          • PCORI Individual Ambassadors
          • PCORI Organizational Ambassadors
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Northeast Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: South Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Midwest Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Western Region
        • Ambassador Program Interest Form
      • Provide Input
        • Past Opportunities to Provide Input
          • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment
            • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment Submissions
          • Comment on the Proposed New and Revised Methodology Standards
          • Peer Review Process Comments
      • Suggest a Patient-Centered Research Question
        • How to Write a Research Question
      • Participate in PCORI Events
        • PCORI in Practice
  • Funding Opportunities
    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
      • FAQs for Applicants
      • Glossary
      • Have a Question?
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review Process
      • Merit Review Criteria
      • Merit Reviewer Resources
        • Merit Review Timeline
        • Reviewer Training
        • Meet Our Reviewers
        • Reviewer FAQs
        • Pre-panel Webinar for Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers (Cycle 1 2017 Dissemination and Implementation)
        • Pre-panel Webinar for Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers (Cycle 1 2017 Low Back Pain)
        • Pre-panel Webinar for Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers (Cycle 1 2017 Pragmatic Clinical Studies)
    • Research Support Funding Opportunities
      • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Review Process
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards FAQs
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Recently Funded Projects
      • Pipeline to Proposal Awards
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Program Offices
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Three-Tiered Program
      • PCORnet Infrastructure Awards
      • The PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge
        • 2014 PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge - Runners Up
          • Judges for PCORI 2014 Challenge
        • PCORI Challenge Initiative - 2013
          • Judges for PCORI 2013 Challenge
      • Research Support Funding
    • Awardee Resources
      • Closed PCORI Funding Announcements
      • Post-Award FAQs
  • Meetings & Events
    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

You are here

  • Comparing Traditional and Participato...

Comparing Traditional and Participatory Dissemination of a Shared Decision Making Intervention

Project Summary  

Changing the behavior of health providers can be challenging, and significant gaps exist in our knowledge of how to best spread or disseminate new medical evidence into everyday practice. This is true when the evidence involves a new patient-centered care method such as shared decision making (SDM). The most common dissemination methods used are journal publications, presentations, and educational material that often fails to produce timely or sustainable practice level changes. A unique partnership between a Medicaid network and a well-established group research network provides an ideal venue to examine the effectiveness of new effective methods of dissemination. We previously developed an asthma toolkit that was tested across a regional network of pediatric, family medicine, and internal medicine healthcare practices in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. During this study, key principles of community-based participatory research were used to engage providers and patients to develop a Facilitator-Led participant OWned (FLOW) approach to dissemination. The FLOW approach uses practice facilitators to guide practices through the process of adapting the toolkit into the existing culture and workflow. This approach led to rapid dissemination and sustainability of the toolkit across six practices. The initial results have shown marked improvement in patient outcomes (including increased adherence to taking medications that control asthma and decreased disease complications) with increased patient involvement in the creation of the care plans.

Objectives: The objective is to determine what dissemination strategy most effectively increases practice level adoption of shared decision making, improves patient outcomes, and increases patient involvement in care decisions.

Methods: Here we will leverage a partnership between the statewide Medicaid network and NCNC, a statewide consortium of research networks, to identify best practices for dissemination of the shared decision-making toolkit. We will test the FLOW method for dissemination on a larger scale by randomizing 30 primary care practices from four practice-based research networks to one of three dissemination arms: (1) FLOW approach to dissemination; (2) traditional dissemination with facilitator exposure; and (3) passive dissemination.

Patient Outcomes (Projected): The primary outcome will be patient perceptions of involvement in their care, measured using a patient survey and qualitative data collection. Secondary outcome measures will be: asthma complications (defined by ED, hospital utilization, and medicine given during asthma complications) and adherence to medication that controls asthma, measured by pharmacy refill rates. This study will provide crucial data to support a novel method for dissemination of a new paradigm of care delivery into primary care practices.

More on This Project

Tapp H, Derkowski D, Calvert M, Welch M, Spencer S. Patient perspectives on engagement in shared decision-making for asthma care. Fam Pract. 2016 Dec 29. pii: cmw122. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw122. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 28034918.

Comparing Traditional and Participatory Dissemination of a Shared Decision Making Intervention (ADAPT-NC): a Cluster Randomized Trial
Hazel Tapp, Andrew McWilliams et al., "Comparing Traditional and Participatory Dissemination of a Shared Decision Making Intervention (ADAPT-NC): a Cluster Randomized Trial," European Journal of Medical Research 9 (October 2014): 158.

Project Details

Principal Investigator
Hazel Tapp, PhD, BSc
Project Status
Awarded; In progress-Recruitment complete
Project Start Date
May 2013
Project End Date
March 2018
Organization
Carolinas Medical Center
Year Awarded
2013
State
North Carolina
Funding Announcement
Communication and Dissemination Research
Primary Condition/Disease 
Respiratory Diseases
Project Budget
$2,148,886
Study Registration Information
HSRP20143270
NCT02047929
Page Last Updated: 
January 6, 2017

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Dissemination and Implementation
  • Peer Review
  • Research Spotlights
  • About Our Research

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Dissemination and Implementation
  • Peer Review
  • Research Spotlights
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • What We Mean by Engagement
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review Process
  • Research Support Funding Opportunities
  • Awardee Resources

Meetings & Events

July 26
Understanding Key Evidence Gaps in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: A Stakeholder Workshop
August 15
Board of Governors Meeting
August 23
Partnerships to Conduct Research within PCORnet (PaCR) Applicant Town Hall - Cycle 2 2017

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
info@pcori.org

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2017 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Credits | Help Center