Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Glossary
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Programs
      • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
      • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
      • Evaluation and Analysis
      • Engagement
      • Research Infrastructure
    • Governance
      • Board of Governors
      • Methodology Committee
      • Committees
        • Engagement, Dissemination, and Implementation Committee
        • Research Transformation Committee
        • Science Oversight Committee
        • Finance and Administration Committee
        • Executive Committee
        • Governance Committee
          • Executive Evaluation and Compensation Subcommittee
        • Scientific Publications Committee
        • Selection Committee
    • Financials and Reports
      • Our Funding
    • Procurement Opportunities
      • Operations Support Funding
      • Research Support Funding
      • Contracted Projects
    • Our Staff
      • Executive Team
      • Office of the Executive Director
        • Evaluation and Analysis
        • Research Infrastructure
      • Office of the General Counsel
      • Science
        • Office of the Chief Science Officer
        • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
        • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
        • Merit Review
        • Peer Review
        • Research Synthesis
      • Engagement
        • Communications
        • Dissemination and Implementation
        • Engagement Awards
        • Office of the Chief Engagement and Dissemination Officer
        • Public and Patient Engagement
        • Public Policy
        • Training
      • Operations
        • Office of the Chief Operations Officer
        • Administrative Services
        • Contracts Management and Administration
        • Finance
        • Human Resources
        • Information Technology
        • Procurement
  • Research & Results
    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Dissemination and Implementation
      • CME/CE Activities
      • Dissemination and Implementation Framework and Toolkit
    • Peer Review
      • Step-by-Step Instructions for Awardees: Peer Review of Draft Final Research Report
      • Peer Review FAQ
    • Research Spotlights
    • About Our Research
      • How We Select Research Topics
        • Generation and Prioritization of Topics for Funding Announcements
        • Topics in the Prioritization Pathway
      • Research We Support
        • National Priorities and Research Agenda
          • How We Developed our National Priorities and Research Agenda
            • Public Comments for PCORI’s National Priorities and Research Agenda
      • Collaborating with Other Research Funders
      • Research Methodology
        • PCORI Methodology Standards
          • Suggest a Topic Area for New Methodology Standards
        • The PCORI Methodology Report
          • Draft Methodology Report Public Comment Period
        • PCORI Methodology Standards and Report FAQ
        • Methodology Standards Academic Curriculum
          • Category 1: Standards for Formulating Research Questions
          • Category 2: Standards Associated with Patient-Centeredness
          • Category 3: Standards for Data Integrity and Rigorous Analyses
          • Category 4: Standards for Preventing and Handling Missing Data
          • Category 5: Standards for Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects
          • Category 6: Standards for Data Registries
          • Category 7: Data Networks as Research-Facilitating Structures
          • Category 8: Standards for Causal Inference Methods
          • Category 9: Standards for Adaptive and Bayesian Trial Designs
          • Category 10: Standards for Studies of Diagnostic Tests
          • Category 11: Standards for Systematic Reviews
        • Methodology Committee - Background
        • Methodology Committee - Workshops and Events
      • Evaluating Our Work
        • Planning Our Evaluation, Reporting the Results
        • PCORI Evaluation Group (PEG)
        • How We Evaluate Key Aspects of Our Work
        • Related Blog Posts
  • Engagement
    • What We Mean by Engagement
      • PCORI’s Stakeholders
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engage with Us
      • Voices of Engagement
        • David White
        • Elizabeth Cox
        • Regina Greer-Smith
        • Kimberly Jinnett
        • Toya Burton
        • David Hahn
        • Rebekah Angove
        • Neely Williams
        • Peter W. Thomas
        • Megan O'Boyle
        • Stephanie Buxhoeveden
        • Sergio Sanchez
      • Become a Merit Reviewer
        • PCORI Stakeholder Reviewer Communities
        • Reviewer Qualifications
        • Reviewer Responsibilities
      • Become a Peer Reviewer
      • Join an Advisory Panel
        • Advisory Panel Openings
        • PCORI Advisory Panels FAQs
        • Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
        • Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
        • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on Recruitment, Accrual, and Retention
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on the Standardization of Complex Concepts and their Terminology
        • Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
        • Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
        • Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
        • Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
      • Become a PCORI Ambassador
        • History of the Ambassador Program
        • About Ambassadors
        • Who are PCORI’s Ambassadors?
          • PCORI Individual Ambassadors
          • PCORI Organizational Ambassadors
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Northeast Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: South Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Midwest Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Western Region
        • Ambassador Program Interest Form
      • Provide Input
        • Past Opportunities to Provide Input
          • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment
            • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment Submissions
          • Comment on the Proposed New and Revised Methodology Standards
          • Peer Review Process Comments
      • Suggest a Patient-Centered Research Question
        • How to Write a Research Question
      • Participate in PCORI Events
        • PCORI in Practice
  • Funding Opportunities
    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
      • FAQs for Applicants
      • Glossary
      • Have a Question?
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review Process
      • Merit Review Criteria
      • Merit Reviewer Resources
        • Merit Review Timeline
        • Reviewer Training
        • Meet Our Reviewers
        • Reviewer FAQs
        • Pre-panel Webinar for Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers (Cycle 1 2017 Dissemination and Implementation)
        • Pre-panel Webinar for Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers (Cycle 1 2017 Low Back Pain)
        • Pre-panel Webinar for Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers (Cycle 1 2017 Pragmatic Clinical Studies)
    • Research Support Funding Opportunities
      • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Review Process
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards FAQs
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Recently Funded Projects
      • Pipeline to Proposal Awards
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Program Offices
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Three-Tiered Program
      • PCORnet Infrastructure Awards
      • The PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge
        • 2014 PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge - Runners Up
          • Judges for PCORI 2014 Challenge
        • PCORI Challenge Initiative - 2013
          • Judges for PCORI 2013 Challenge
      • Research Support Funding
    • Awardee Resources
      • Closed PCORI Funding Announcements
      • Post-Award FAQs
  • Meetings & Events
    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

You are here

  • The Patient-Reported Outcomes Project...

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Project of HCV-TARGET (PROP up TARGET)

Project Summary  

Background: Newer, more effective medication regimens for chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection are approved. For the first time, patients and providers will have more than one treatment option from which to choose. Deciding which treatment to choose may be challenging for patients, as regimens may be relatively similar on cure rates but may differ on other harms and benefits that matter to patients. Data collected from clinical drug trials do not provide all the answers, nor does the data represent the broad range of patients who will be treated in real-world clinical practice. Meanwhile, HCV-TARGET is the largest international research network and clinical registry of patients undergoing treatment, and provides a unique opportunity to evaluate patient-reported outcomes in a diverse spectrum of patients treated in real-world clinical settings.

Methods: PROP up TARGET will be a prospective, observational cohort study of 1,600 patients infected with genotype 1 HCV and who initiate treatment at eight US liver centers. A HCV patient engagement group (HCV-PEG) and data derived from 45 patient interviews identified the top-priority information that affects patient decision making. Based on these informational needs of HCV patients, we will ask study participants to complete surveys to collect information on: (1) harms that may occur during treatment (side effects, poor functioning, out-of-pocket costs, difficulty with adherence); (2) benefits of treatment 3 months after it ends (do preexisting HCV symptoms and functioning improve?); and (3) longer-term toxicities and side effects that may occur up to 1 year after treatment ends. Participants will complete surveys at 5 time points: before treatment, twice during treatment, and 3 and 12 months after treatment. Our HCV-PEG members took, on average, 13 minutes to complete the surveys. Participants can answer surveys via three methods based on their preference: from their home-based computers, from a phone interview with our call center, or with the research coordinator at regularly scheduled visits with the liver doctor. All data will be entered into a web-based secure data management system. Our HCV-PEG indicated that it was reasonable to pay participants $25 for the first three assessments and $40 for the last two assessments.

Patient Engagement: Our research team includes patient partners (seven members of the HCV-PEG) and a patient advocacy organization; both will represent the patients’ voices on the study steering committee.

PROP up TARGET is committed to collecting information to help patients and providers make more-informed treatment decisions. This study to compare two new all-pill treatments is the first head-to-head study of short-term and longer-term outcomes that were selected by patients with HCV, and will matter most to patients making future decisions about HCV treatment.

More on This Project

Evon DM, Golin CE, Stewart P, et al., Patient engagement and study design of PROP UP: A multi-site patient-centered prospective observational study of patients undergoing hepatitis C treatment, Contemporary Clinical Trials (March 2017).

Project Details

Principal Investigator
Donna Evon, PhD
Project Status
Awarded; In progress-Recruiting
Project Start Date
April 2015
Project End Date
October 2018
Organization
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Year Awarded
2015
State
North Carolina
Funding Announcement
Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
Primary Condition/Disease 
Infectious Diseases
Project Budget
$2,465,435
Study Registration Information
HSRP20153562
NCT02601820
Page Last Updated: 
March 28, 2017

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Dissemination and Implementation
  • Peer Review
  • Research Spotlights
  • About Our Research

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Dissemination and Implementation
  • Peer Review
  • Research Spotlights
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • What We Mean by Engagement
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review Process
  • Research Support Funding Opportunities
  • Awardee Resources

Meetings & Events

July 26
Understanding Key Evidence Gaps in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: A Stakeholder Workshop
August 15
Board of Governors Meeting
August 23
Partnerships to Conduct Research within PCORnet (PaCR) Applicant Town Hall - Cycle 2 2017

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
info@pcori.org

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2017 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Credits | Help Center