Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Glossary
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Programs
      • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
      • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
      • Evaluation and Analysis
      • Engagement
      • Research Infrastructure
    • Governance
      • Board of Governors
      • Methodology Committee
      • Committees
        • Engagement, Dissemination, and Implementation Committee
        • Research Transformation Committee
        • Science Oversight Committee
        • Finance and Administration Committee
        • Executive Committee
        • Governance Committee
          • Executive Evaluation and Compensation Subcommittee
        • Scientific Publications Committee
        • Selection Committee
    • Financials and Reports
      • Our Funding
    • Procurement Opportunities
      • Operations Support Funding
      • Research Support Funding
      • Contracted Projects
    • Our Staff
      • Executive Team
      • Office of the Executive Director
        • Evaluation and Analysis
        • Research Infrastructure
      • Office of the General Counsel
      • Science
        • Office of the Chief Science Officer
        • Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
        • Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
        • Merit Review
        • Peer Review
        • Research Synthesis
      • Engagement
        • Communications
        • Dissemination and Implementation
        • Engagement Awards
        • Office of the Chief Engagement and Dissemination Officer
        • Public and Patient Engagement
        • Public Policy
        • Training
      • Operations
        • Office of the Chief Operations Officer
        • Administrative Services
        • Contracts Management and Administration
        • Finance
        • Human Resources
        • Information Technology
        • Procurement
  • Research & Results
    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Dissemination and Implementation
      • CME/CE Activities
      • Dissemination and Implementation Framework and Toolkit
    • Peer Review
      • Step-by-Step Instructions for Awardees: Peer Review of Draft Final Research Report
      • Peer Review FAQ
    • Research Spotlights
    • About Our Research
      • How We Select Research Topics
        • Generation and Prioritization of Topics for Funding Announcements
        • Topics in the Prioritization Pathway
      • Research We Support
        • National Priorities and Research Agenda
          • How We Developed our National Priorities and Research Agenda
            • Public Comments for PCORI’s National Priorities and Research Agenda
      • Collaborating with Other Research Funders
      • Research Methodology
        • PCORI Methodology Standards
          • Suggest a Topic Area for New Methodology Standards
        • The PCORI Methodology Report
          • Draft Methodology Report Public Comment Period
        • PCORI Methodology Standards and Report FAQ
        • Methodology Standards Academic Curriculum
          • Category 1: Standards for Formulating Research Questions
          • Category 2: Standards Associated with Patient-Centeredness
          • Category 3: Standards for Data Integrity and Rigorous Analyses
          • Category 4: Standards for Preventing and Handling Missing Data
          • Category 5: Standards for Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects
          • Category 6: Standards for Data Registries
          • Category 7: Data Networks as Research-Facilitating Structures
          • Category 8: Standards for Causal Inference Methods
          • Category 9: Standards for Adaptive and Bayesian Trial Designs
          • Category 10: Standards for Studies of Diagnostic Tests
          • Category 11: Standards for Systematic Reviews
        • Methodology Committee - Background
        • Methodology Committee - Workshops and Events
      • Evaluating Our Work
        • Planning Our Evaluation, Reporting the Results
        • PCORI Evaluation Group (PEG)
        • How We Evaluate Key Aspects of Our Work
        • Related Blog Posts
  • Engagement
    • What We Mean by Engagement
      • PCORI’s Stakeholders
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engage with Us
      • Voices of Engagement
        • David White
        • Elizabeth Cox
        • Regina Greer-Smith
        • Kimberly Jinnett
        • Toya Burton
        • David Hahn
        • Rebekah Angove
        • Neely Williams
        • Peter W. Thomas
        • Megan O'Boyle
        • Stephanie Buxhoeveden
        • Sergio Sanchez
      • Become a Merit Reviewer
        • PCORI Stakeholder Reviewer Communities
        • Reviewer Qualifications
        • Reviewer Responsibilities
      • Become a Peer Reviewer
      • Join an Advisory Panel
        • Advisory Panel Openings
        • PCORI Advisory Panels FAQs
        • Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Addressing Disparities
        • Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
        • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on Recruitment, Accrual, and Retention
          • Advisory Panel on Clinical Trials Subcommittee on the Standardization of Complex Concepts and their Terminology
        • Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Communication and Dissemination Research
        • Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Improving Healthcare Systems
        • Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement
        • Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
          • Biographies - Advisory Panel on Rare Disease
      • Become a PCORI Ambassador
        • History of the Ambassador Program
        • About Ambassadors
        • Who are PCORI’s Ambassadors?
          • PCORI Individual Ambassadors
          • PCORI Organizational Ambassadors
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Northeast Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: South Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Midwest Region
          • PCORI Ambassadors: Western Region
        • Ambassador Program Interest Form
      • Provide Input
        • Past Opportunities to Provide Input
          • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment
            • Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment Submissions
          • Comment on the Proposed New and Revised Methodology Standards
          • Peer Review Process Comments
      • Suggest a Patient-Centered Research Question
        • How to Write a Research Question
      • Participate in PCORI Events
        • PCORI in Practice
  • Funding Opportunities
    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
      • FAQs for Applicants
      • Glossary
      • Have a Question?
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review Process
      • Merit Review Criteria
      • Merit Reviewer Resources
        • Merit Review Timeline
        • Reviewer Training
        • Meet Our Reviewers
        • Reviewer FAQs
        • Pre-panel Webinar for Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers (Cycle 1 2017 Dissemination and Implementation)
        • Pre-panel Webinar for Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers (Cycle 1 2017 Low Back Pain)
        • Pre-panel Webinar for Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers (Cycle 1 2017 Pragmatic Clinical Studies)
    • Research Support Funding Opportunities
      • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Review Process
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards FAQs
        • Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards: Recently Funded Projects
      • Pipeline to Proposal Awards
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Program Offices
        • Pipeline to Proposal Awards: Three-Tiered Program
      • PCORnet Infrastructure Awards
      • The PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge
        • 2014 PCORI Matchmaking App Challenge - Runners Up
          • Judges for PCORI 2014 Challenge
        • PCORI Challenge Initiative - 2013
          • Judges for PCORI 2013 Challenge
      • Research Support Funding
    • Awardee Resources
      • Closed PCORI Funding Announcements
      • Post-Award FAQs
  • Meetings & Events
    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

You are here

  • Comparing Electroconvulsive Therapy a...

Comparing Electroconvulsive Therapy and Ketamine Treatment for Adults with Major Depression That Has Not Responded to Antidepressant Medicines

Project Summary  

PCORI has identified treatment-resistant depression as an important research topic. Patients, clinicians, and others want to learn: for patients whose depression has not gotten better after trying two or more antidepressants, is adding another treatment better or worse than switching to a new one? To help answer this question, PCORI launched a targeted funding initiative in 2015 called Management Strategies for Treatment-Resistant Depression. This research project is one of the studies PCORI awarded as part of this program.

This research project is in progress. PCORI will post the research findings on this page within 90 days after the results are final.

What is the research about?

Major depression is a serious medical illness that affects tens of millions of adults in the United States. Major depression is more than just feeling sad or blue for a few days.

People with depression can

  • Feel sad or empty
  • Lose interest in their favorite activities
  • Eat and sleep a lot more or a lot less than they usually do
  • Feel tired, hopeless, irritable, anxious, or guilty
  • Have physical symptoms such as aches, pains, headaches, cramps, or digestive problems
  • Think about death or suicide

One in three adults with major depression does not feel better even after treatment with antidepressant medicines. When antidepressants don’t help, people have a form of major depression called treatment-resistant depression. People with treatment-resistant depression are at risk of alcohol use, drug use, hospitalization, and suicide attempts.

This study compares electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and the medication ketamine to see which works best for adults with treatment-resistant depression. ECT, sometimes called shock therapy, is an effective treatment for adults with treatment-resistant depression. But people may feel ashamed about getting ECT or may not like its side effects, such as memory problems. They may also dislike receiving anesthesia to become unconscious to get ECT or suffering memory loss from the treatment. Ketamine has no effects on memory and is given when a person is awake, but it may have other side effects and is not a standard treatment for depression.

Who can this research help?

This study can help people with major depression that does not get better after they take multiple antidepressants. The results may help these people and their doctors choose a new treatment.

What is the research team doing?

The research team is comparing two ways to treat adults with treatment-resistant depression. One treatment is ECT. During ECT, a person gets medicine to make them sleep, and a small amount of electrical current passes through the brain, causing a seizure. The seizure causes chemical changes in the brain that can help relieve depression.

The second treatment in this study is a medicine called ketamine. A doctor injects ketamine in small doses. People are awake while receiving ketamine, and it does not cause memory loss. However, ketamine is normally used to prevent and manage pain, not as a standard treatment for depression. So, its safety and effectiveness for treating severe depression are unknown. Ketamine can also cause some side effects, people can abuse it. Ketamine is not covered by insurance.

The research team is involving volunteers whose doctors have referred them for ECT treatment. Patients in the study agree to be assigned by chance to receive one of the two treatments—either ketamine twice a week or ECT three times a week—for three weeks. Patients report changes in their depression symptoms, memory, and quality of life. The research team is also asking patients’ doctors how they rate the patients’ depression. The team follows patients whose depression gets better after receiving ECT or ketamine for six months. The research team tracks how these patients feel after they return to their regular doctors.

The research team is designing and running the study with input from people with major depression, patient advocacy groups, healthcare professionals, and organizations that pay for health care. A committee of these individuals is advising the research team and monitoring the study’s progress.

Research methods at a glance

Design Element Description
Design Randomized controlled trial
Population Adults ages 21 to 75 years who have a diagnosis of depression and who have had at least two adequate trials of antidepressant treatment during their lifetime.
Interventions/
Comparators
  • Electroconvulsive therapy
  • Ketamine
Outcomes Self-reported change in depressive symptoms, memory function, and quality of life (primary); scores on depression measurement scales
Timeframe Three weeks or end of treatment period for primary outcome

Project Details

Principal Investigator
Amit Anand, MD
Project Status
Awarded; In progress-Recruiting
Project Title
Electroconvulsive Therapy versus Ketamine for Treatment Resistant Depression
Project Start Date
July 2016
Project End Date
September 2022
Organization
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Year Awarded
2016
State
Ohio
Funding Announcement
Management Strategies for Treatment-Resistant Depression
Primary Condition/Disease 
Neurological Disorders
Project Budget
$11,128,538
Study Registration Information
HSRP20164159

Partners

Patient/Caregiver Partners

  • Kara Browning, MD, Patient Partner
  • Albert LeDoux, Patient Consultant
  • Margaret Petrasko, Patient Partner
  • Kathy Schroedel, Patient Partner
  • Michael Baskin LISW, CEAP, Executive Director, National Alliance on Mental Illness
  • Dennis Hartman, Founder/Executive Director, Ketamine Advocacy Network
  • Charles Harman, National Director, Strategic Alliances and Development National Alliance on Mental Illness

Other Stakeholder Partners

  • Donald Malone, MD, Professor and Chair, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Cleveland Clinic
  • Roman Dale, MD, Director, Cleveland Clinic Section of Adult Inpatient Psychiatry, Cleveland Clinic and Lutheran Hospital
  • Gerard Sanacora, MD, PhD, Professor, Yale University
  • Robert Ostroff, MD, Director ECT Service Yale-New Haven Hospital
  • Sanjay Mathew, MD, Associate Professor, Baylor College of Medicine
  • Ali Asghar-Ali, MD, Associate Professor in Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine
  • James Murrough, MD, Director, Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program; Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Charles Kellner, MD, Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • David Muzina, MD, Senior Medical Director, Medical Mutual of Ohio
  • Rhonda J. Robinson Beale, MD, SVP and CMO of Medical Quality Management for Blue Cross of Idaho
  • Mary Rosedale, PhD, PMHNP-BC, Executive Committee Member, International Society for ECT and Neurostimulation
Page Last Updated: 
July 17, 2017

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Dissemination and Implementation
  • Peer Review
  • Research Spotlights
  • About Our Research

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Dissemination and Implementation
  • Peer Review
  • Research Spotlights
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • What We Mean by Engagement
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review Process
  • Research Support Funding Opportunities
  • Awardee Resources

Meetings & Events

July 26
Understanding Key Evidence Gaps in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: A Stakeholder Workshop
August 15
Board of Governors Meeting
August 23
Partnerships to Conduct Research within PCORnet (PaCR) Applicant Town Hall - Cycle 2 2017

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
info@pcori.org

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2017 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Credits | Help Center