TIME Magazine Recognizes Two PCORI Awardees
- 2023 Annual Meeting
- The PCORI Strategic Plan
- Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
- Dissemination and Implementation
- Evaluation and Analysis
- Healthcare Delivery and Disparities Research
- PCOR Infrastructure & Innovation
- Our Vision & Mission
- Financial Statements and Reports
- The PCORI Strategic Plan
- Board of Governors
- Methodology Committee
- Authorizing Law
- Evaluating Our Work
- PCORI's Advisory Panels
- Procurement Opportunities
Past Opportunities to Provide Input
- Stakeholder Views on Components of 'Patient-Centered Value' in Health and Health Care (2023)
- PCORI's Proposed Research Agenda (2021-2022)
- Proposed National Priorities for Health (2021)
- Proposed Principles for the Consideration of the Full Range of Outcomes Data in PCORI-Funded Research (2020)
- Proposed New PCORI Methodology Standards (2018)
- Data Access and Data Sharing Policy: Public Comment (2017)
- Proposed New PCORI Methodology Standards (2017)
Comment on the Proposed New and Revised PCORI Methodology Standards (2016)
- 1. Standards for Formulating Research Questions
- 10: Standards for Studies of Diagnostic Tests
- 12. Standards on Research Designs Using Clusters
- 13: General Comments on the Proposed Revisions to the PCORI Methodology Standards
- 2: Standards Associated with Patient-Centeredness
- 3: Standards for Data Integrity and Rigorous Analysis
- 4: Standards for Preventing and Handling Missing Data
- 5: Standards for Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects
- 6: Standards for Data Registries
- 7: Standards for Data Networks as Research-Facilitating Structures
- 8. Standards for Causal Inference Methods
- 9. Standards for Adaptive Trial Designs
- Peer-Review Process Comments (2014)
- Draft Methodology Report Public Comment Period (2012)
- Past Opportunities to Provide Input
Among all of the many lists of influential people, TIME magazine’s annual selection is at the top. This year we are thrilled that TIME named two PCORI awardees as among the 100 most influential people in the world. So I thought I’d take a moment to celebrate their accomplishment.
Laura Esserman, MD, MBA, and Shelley Hwang, MD, MPH, of the University of California, San Francisco, and Duke University, respectively, are breast cancer surgeons who think we may be overdiagnosing and overtreating some breast cancer in our efforts to reduce its incidence and impact. Their PCORI-funded studies are aimed at discovering whether we can make breast cancer screening more personalized and avoid treatments such as surgery and radiation—with all their side effects—for women with a low chance of benefiting from them.
Esserman’s study focuses on mammography. Her team will begin this summer to randomly assign a very large number of women—100,000—to receive mammograms either annually or at a rate determined by each woman’s level of risk. In some cases, women will choose one approach or the other.
Hwang is the principal investigator of two PCORI studies, both examining alternatives to aggressive treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a very early form of breast cancer in which abnormal cells have not spread outside the milk ducts. In one study using information from existing databases, Hwang and her team are comparing outcomes of treatment (surgery or radiation) versus active surveillance, in which patients delay treatment while doctors monitor them intensely for signs of progression. In a second study, Hwang will seek about 1,200 women with low-risk DCIS to participate in a randomized study comparing treatment (again, surgery or radiation) to active surveillance. The team will look for differences in cancer and in clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
As described in TIME, “these doctors’ groundbreaking research is starting to bear out the fact that women have more options.” For them and for PCORI, the goal is not to find one treatment that suits everyone but to find the right treatment for each person based on her or his individual circumstances and the outcomes important to them. That’s what we call “research done differently.”
At PCORI, we rely heavily on our patients and other healthcare stakeholders to help us decide which research questions are most important to study and how we can best answer them. Esserman and Hwang are just two of the creative, world-class researchers we rely on to help us achieve that goal. So from all of us at PCORI, congratulations to them and cheers to TIME for recognizing their pioneering work and its potential impact.
What's Happening at PCORI?
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute sends weekly emails about opportunities to apply for funding, newly funded research studies and engagement projects, results of our funded research, webinars, and other new information posted on our site.