The objective of this study was to compare the comprehensiveness and efficiency of individual interviews and group concept mapping for generating patient-important outcomes.

Project page: Comparing Two Ways to Identify What's Important to Patients in Research
Principal Investigator: Kristin L. Rising, MD, MSHP
Organization: Thomas Jefferson University
Original project title: Concept Mapping as a Scalable Method for Identifying Patient-Important Outcomes
HSRProj ID: 20162165
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02792777

To cite this document, please use: Rising KL, LaNoue M, Gentsch AT, et al. (2020). Comparing Two Ways to Identify What’s Important to Patients in Research. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). https://doi.org/10.25302/06.2020.ME.150328476

Tags

Resource Type

What's Happening at PCORI?

The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute sends weekly emails highlighting results of our funded studies, newly funded research and engagement awards, opportunities to apply for funding, stakeholder workshops, and original feature stories about our funded projects.

Sign Up for Updates

Image

Hand pointing to email icon