Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Find It Fast
  • Help Center
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • About Us
    Close mega-menu

    About Us

    • Our Programs
    • Governance
    • Financials and Reports
    • Procurement Opportunities
    • Our Staff
    • Our Vision & Mission
    • Contact Us

    Fact Sheets: Learn More About PCORI

    Download fact sheets about out work, the research we fund, and our programs and initiatives.

    Find It Fast

    Browse through an alphabetical list of frequently accessed and searched terms for information and resources.

    Subscribe to PCORI Email Alerts

    Sign up for weekly emails to stay current on the latest results of our funded projects, and more.

  • Research & Results
    Close mega-menu

    Research & Results

    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Research Fundamentals
    • Research Results Highlights
    • Putting Evidence to Work
    • Peer Review
    • Evidence Synthesis
    • About Our Research

    Evidence Updates from PCORI-Funded Studies

    These updates capture highlights of findings from systematic reviews and our funded research studies.

    Journal Articles About Our Funded Research

    Browse through a collection of journal publications that provides insights into PCORI-funded work.

    Explore Our Portfolio of Funded Projects

    Find out about projects based on the health conditions they focus on, the state they are in, and if they have results.

  • Topics
    Close mega-menu

    Topics

    • Addressing Disparities
    • Arthritis
    • Asthma
    • Cancer
    • Cardiovascular Disease
    • Children's Health
    • Community Health Workers
    • COVID-19
    • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment
    • Diabetes
    • Kidney Disease
    • Medicaid
    • Men's Health
    • Mental and Behavioral Health
    • Minority Mental Health
    • Multiple Chronic Conditions
    • Multiple Sclerosis
    • Obesity
    • Older Adults' Health
    • Pain Care and Opioids
    • Rare Diseases
    • Rural Health
    • Shared Decision Making
    • Telehealth
    • Transitional Care
    • Veterans Health
    • Women's Health

    Featured Topic: Women's Health

    Learn more about the projects we support on conditions that specifically or more often affect women.

  • Engagement
    Close mega-menu

    Engagement

    • The Value of Engagement
    • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
    • Influencing the Culture of Research
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engagement Resources
    • Engage with Us

    Engagement Tools and Resources for Research

    This searchable peer-to-peer repository includes resources that can inform future work in patient-centered outcomes research.

    Explore Engagement in Health Literature

    This tool enables searching for published articles about engagement in health research.

    Research Fundamentals: A New On-Demand Training

    It enables those new to health research or patient-centered research to learn more about the research process.

  • Funding Opportunities
    Close mega-menu

    Funding Opportunities

    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review
    • Awardee Resources
    • Help Center

    PCORI Funding Opportunities

    View and learn about the newly opened funding announcements and the upcoming PFAs in 2021.

    Tips for Submitting a Responsive LOI

    Find out what PCORI looks for in a letter of intent (LOI) along with other helpful tips.

    PCORI Awardee Resources

    These resources can help awardees in complying with the terms and conditions of their contract.

  • Meetings & Events
    Close mega-menu

    Meetings & Events

    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

    PCORI 2021 and Beyond

    During this webinar, PCORI leaders shared ways to get involved in PCOR, improvements to our funding opportunities, and more.

    Confronting COVID-19: A Webinar Series

    Learn more about the series and access recordings and summary reports of all six sessions.

    2020 PCORI Annual Meeting

    Watch recordings of all sessions, and view titles and descriptions of the posters presented at the virtual meeting.

You are here

  • Research & Results
  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Can Coping-Skills Training Help Patie...

This project has results

Can Coping-Skills Training Help Patients Who Have Received Intensive Hospital Care to Cope with Depression and Anxiety?

Sign Up for Updates to This Study  

Results Summary and Professional Abstract

Results Summary
Download Summary Español (pdf) Audio Recording (mp3)

Results Summary

What was the research about?

Every year, nearly 1 million patients in hospital intensive care units (ICUs) get life support from machines that help them breathe. When these patients are well enough to leave the hospital, they often need help to deal with depression or anxiety.

In this study, the research team compared how well two programs worked to help patients cope with depression or anxiety after being on a breathing machine in an ICU:

  • Coping-skills program that included weekly phone calls with patients and families to discuss how to cope with symptoms, plus online education materials
  • Educational program that included online materials about the cause and treatment of the patient’s illness

What were the results?

For most patients and their families, neither program helped improve symptoms of depression or anxiety. But, for patients with high levels of depression and anxiety, the coping-skills program helped improve depression or anxiety symptoms more than the educational program.

Who was in the study?

The study included 175 patients who had been on a breathing machine in a hospital ICU for at least two days. The study also included 86 of the patients’ family members, who were mostly spouses or parents. The average age of patients was 52.

What did the research team do?

The research team assigned patients to one of two groups by chance. In the first group, patients received 30-minute phone calls every week for six weeks. During the calls, a psychologist gave patients advice about how to manage symptoms and develop coping skills. Patients also had access to online materials. In the second group, patients received six informational videos and materials about their illness. Patients in the second group also had two calls with a member of the research team to ask questions about the study.

The team interviewed the patients and their families before assigning them to groups, and then three months and six months after the study started.

What were the limits of the study?

Many patients who joined the study became too ill or died before they could complete the study. As a result, the study may not have been able to detect some differences between the two programs. Future research could find out more about how the programs work for different groups of people.

How can people use the results?

Hospital ICUs could consider using a program to teach coping skills to patients who are very depressed or anxious at hospital discharge from the ICU.

Professional Abstract

Professional Abstract

Objective

To compare a telephone- and web-based coping-skills training program with an educational program about critical illness to reduce anxiety and depression symptoms in patients discharged from the hospital following mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) and their family members

Study Design

Design Element Description
Study Design Randomized controlled trial
Population 175 patients who were discharged following mechanical ventilation in the ICU and 86 of their family members
Interventions/
Comparators
  • Telephone- and web-based coping-skills training program 
  • Educational program with web-based, video, and printed information about critical illness
Outcomes

Primary: summary score on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Secondary: HADS anxiety and depression subscale scores, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), quality of life, mental and physical health status, coping behaviors, self-efficacy

Timeframe 6-month follow-up for primary outcome

In this randomized controlled clinical trial, the research team compared a telephone- and web-based coping-skills training program with an educational program that included web-based, video, and printed information about critical illness. The primary outcome was combined symptoms of depression and anxiety. Secondary outcomes were depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, mental and physical health status, quality of life, positive coping behaviors, and self-efficacy in patients and their family members.

Patients and family members in the coping-skills training program received weekly 30-minute phone calls from a psychologist for six weeks to discuss coping skills for managing emotional distress and physical disabilities. They also received links to online materials with information about these coping skills. Patients and family members in the educational program received six informational videos, as well as print and web-based information about patients’ illnesses, a phone call with a researcher to review materials, and a follow-up call with a researcher to answer participants’ questions.

This study included 175 patients who were discharged from four hospitals’ ICUs after receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours. About 57% of patients were male, and 71% of patients were white. The mean patient age was 52. The study also included 86 family members, most of whom were spouses or parents.

The research team interviewed study participants three times: prior to randomization, three months after the start of the trial, and six months after the start of the trial.

Results

Overall, compared with the educational program, the coping-skills training program did not reduce symptoms of depression, anxiety, or PTSD for patients or their family members. Similarly, there were no significant differences in quality of life, physical health status, or mental health status. However, among patients who had high levels of depression and anxiety at baseline, those in the coping-skills training program had reduced psychological distress symptoms at six months compared with those in the educational program (p = 0.02).

Limitations

Almost 40% of the patients who consented to the study while in the hospital did not participate. The primary reason for lack of participation was persistent or worsening illness.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among the patients who received mechanical ventilation in the ICU and their family members, the coping-skills training program did no better than the educational program in reducing depression and anxiety symptoms. However, patients with high baseline levels of anxiety and depression had improved anxiety and depression after the coping-skills training program.

Future Research Needs

To help patients discharged from the ICU after mechanical ventilation and their family members, future research could consider ways to improve the delivery of therapies focused on coping skills to patients who have high levels of distress after they arrive home.

Final Research Report

View this project's final research report.

Journal Articles

Results of This Project

Critical Care Medicine

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Financial Stress in Survivors of Critical Illness

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Effects of a Telephone- and Web-based Coping Skills Training Program Compared to an Education Program for Survivors of Critical Illness and Their Family Members: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Related Articles

Journal of Palliative Medicine

The Patient and Family Member Experience of Financial Stress Related to Critical Illness

American Journal of Critical Care

Usability Testing of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System for Survivors of Critical Illness

More on this Project  

Peer-Review Summary

Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also confirms that the research has followed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts who were not members of the research team read a draft report of the research. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. Reviewers do not have conflicts of interest with the study.

The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve how the research team analyzed its results or reported its conclusions. Learn more about PCORI’s peer review process here.

In response to peer review, the PI made changes including

  • Providing more emphasis on 6-month outcomes to mirror the results posted at ClinicalTrials.gov
  • Clarifying that because the primary outcomes of the compared interventions did not differ significantly, the apparent differences in the secondary outcomes should be considered exploratory and subject to confirmatory research
  • Including a Supplement with additional information about patient and stakeholder engagement, more detailed analyses, and intervention details that did not fit into the main text

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

View the COI disclosure form.

Project Details

Principal Investigator
Christopher Ethan Cox, MD, MPH
Project Status
Completed; PCORI Public and Professional Abstracts, and Final Research Report Posted
Project Title
Improving Psychological Distress Among Critical Illness Survivors and Their Informal Caregivers
Board Approval Date
December 2012
Project End Date
January 2017
Organization
Duke University
Year Awarded
2012
State
North Carolina
Year Completed
2017
Project Type
Research Project
Health Conditions  
Mental/Behavioral Health
Depression
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
Anxiety
Respiratory Diseases
Intervention Strategies
Behavioral Interventions
Technology Interventions
Training and Education Interventions
Populations
Racial/Ethnic Minorities
Low Health Literacy/Numeracy
Older Adults
Women
Funding Announcement
Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
Project Budget
$1,888,100
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
10.25302/9.2018.CER.195
Study Registration Information
HSRP20142219
NCT01983254
Page Last Updated: 
February 20, 2020

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff
  • Our Vision & Mission
  • Contact Us

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Research Fundamentals
  • Research Results Highlights
  • Putting Evidence to Work
  • Peer Review
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • The Value of Engagement
  • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
  • Influencing the Culture of Research
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engagement Resources
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review
  • Awardee Resources
  • Help Center

Meetings & Events

March 15
Priorities on the Health Horizon: Informing PCORI's Strategic Plan (Webinar)
March 15
PCORI Workshop on Methodologic Challenges in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research
March 16
Board of Governors Meeting: March 16, 2021

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
[email protected]

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2021 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademark Usage Guidelines | Credits | Help Center