Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Find It Fast
  • Help Center
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • About Us
    Close mega-menu

    About Us

    • Our Programs
    • Governance
    • Financials and Reports
    • Procurement Opportunities
    • Our Staff
    • Our Vision & Mission
    • Contact Us

    Fact Sheets: Learn More About PCORI

    Download fact sheets about out work, the research we fund, and our programs and initiatives.

    Find It Fast

    Browse through an alphabetical list of frequently accessed and searched terms for information and resources.

    Subscribe to PCORI Email Alerts

    Sign up for weekly emails to stay current on the latest results of our funded projects, and more.

  • Research & Results
    Close mega-menu

    Research & Results

    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Research Fundamentals
    • Research Results Highlights
    • Putting Evidence to Work
    • Peer Review
    • Evidence Synthesis
    • About Our Research

    Evidence Updates from PCORI-Funded Studies

    These updates capture highlights of findings from systematic reviews and our funded research studies.

    Journal Articles About Our Funded Research

    Browse through a collection of journal publications that provides insights into PCORI-funded work.

    Explore Our Portfolio of Funded Projects

    Find out about projects based on the health conditions they focus on, the state they are in, and if they have results.

  • Topics
    Close mega-menu

    Topics

    • Addressing Disparities
    • Arthritis
    • Asthma
    • Cancer
    • Cardiovascular Disease
    • Children's Health
    • Community Health Workers
    • COVID-19
    • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment
    • Diabetes
    • Kidney Disease
    • Medicaid
    • Men's Health
    • Mental and Behavioral Health
    • Minority Mental Health
    • Multiple Chronic Conditions
    • Multiple Sclerosis
    • Obesity
    • Older Adults' Health
    • Pain Care and Opioids
    • Rare Diseases
    • Rural Health
    • Shared Decision Making
    • Telehealth
    • Transitional Care
    • Veterans Health
    • Women's Health

    Featured Topic: Women's Health

    Learn more about the projects we support on conditions that specifically or more often affect women.

  • Engagement
    Close mega-menu

    Engagement

    • The Value of Engagement
    • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
    • Influencing the Culture of Research
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engagement Resources
    • Engage with Us

    Engagement Tools and Resources for Research

    This searchable peer-to-peer repository includes resources that can inform future work in patient-centered outcomes research.

    Explore Engagement in Health Literature

    This tool enables searching for published articles about engagement in health research.

    Research Fundamentals: A New On-Demand Training

    It enables those new to health research or patient-centered research to learn more about the research process.

  • Funding Opportunities
    Close mega-menu

    Funding Opportunities

    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review
    • Awardee Resources
    • Help Center

    PCORI Funding Opportunities

    View and learn about the newly opened funding announcements and the upcoming PFAs in 2021.

    Tips for Submitting a Responsive LOI

    Find out what PCORI looks for in a letter of intent (LOI) along with other helpful tips.

    PCORI Awardee Resources

    These resources can help awardees in complying with the terms and conditions of their contract.

  • Meetings & Events
    Close mega-menu

    Meetings & Events

    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

    PCORI 2021 and Beyond

    During this webinar, PCORI leaders shared ways to get involved in PCOR, improvements to our funding opportunities, and more.

    Confronting COVID-19: A Webinar Series

    Learn more about the series and access recordings and summary reports of all six sessions.

    2020 PCORI Annual Meeting

    Watch recordings of all sessions, and view titles and descriptions of the posters presented at the virtual meeting.

You are here

  • Research & Results
  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Identifying Personal Strengths to Hel...

This project has results

Identifying Personal Strengths to Help Patients Manage Chronic Illness

Sign Up for Updates to This Study  

Results Summary and Professional Abstract

Results Summary
Download Summary Español (pdf) Audio Recording (mp3)

Results Summary

What was the research about?

Most health care focuses on what is wrong with people. In this study, the research team focused instead on people’s strengths. The team wanted to identify the personal strengths that patients might find helpful in managing chronic illness or improving health habits. To that end, the team created a computer app to help patients recognize personal strengths they can draw on. Then, the team tried to identify times when bringing patient strengths into health care might help patients.

What were the results?

Patients in the study reported 30 personal strengths that might be helpful in managing illness or improving health habits. The strengths fit into three groups:

  • Personal traits, such as having a positive attitude
  • Relationships, such as having family or friends who support the patient
  • Access to community resources, such as knowing where to go for help with a health problem

A design team of patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals worked with the research team to create an app called Strengths Collector. The app shows four videos of patients talking about knowing their strengths. In the app, users pick their strengths from a list and rate how important each strength is for a visit to their doctor. Strengths then appear on the app in order of importance for that visit. Patients and doctors can discuss this list to plan care.

The design team also identified situations when bringing strengths into health care might be helpful for patients. Examples include

  • Managing diabetes
  • Managing ongoing pain
  • When patients have to use health care often

Who was in the study?

The research team gathered information from 76 patients with chronic illnesses. Of these patients, 41 were African American, 20 were white, 1 was Asian, 1 was multi-race, and 13 were unknown race. All patients were from Cleveland, Ohio.

What did the research team do?

To create a list of strengths that might help patients manage illnesses, the research team met with 76 patients and healthcare professionals. Then, the team invited 19 patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals to form a design team. The design team worked with computer programmers to create the app and identify when doctors and patients can use patient strengths in health care.

What were the limits of the study?

The study only tested the app with small numbers of patients. The team also wasn’t able to test if using patient strengths improved patient health.

Future research could look at whether patients and clinicians can use the app in real-world visits and whether strengths-based care improves patient health.

How can people use the results?

Healthcare professionals and patients can use the list of strengths to think about ways to help patients better manage illness or improve health habits. Patients can use the app to find their strengths to help plan care with their doctors.

Professional Abstract

Professional Abstract

Objective

(1) To identify personal strengths relevant to chronic illness management; (2) To create a tablet-based app to help patients identify these strengths when managing chronic illness; (3) To identify scenarios in which a strengths-based approach might be helpful

Study Design

Design Elements Description
Design Empirical analysis
Data Sources and Data Sets Focus groups with clinicians, social workers, and patients to identify personal strengths relevant to chronic illness management; meetings with design team of patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals to develop tablet-based app and identify design criteria for a strengths-based approach to health care
Analytic Approach Qualitative analysis
Outcomes

List of patient strengths relevant to chronic illness management, tablet-based app to identify patient-generated lists of strengths

Health care for patients has traditionally focused on deficits, such as diseases, risk factors, and unhealthy behaviors rather than strengths, such as skills or resources. Academic researchers worked with patients with multiple chronic illnesses and primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, and social workers to conduct this study in two phases.

In the first phase, the research team conducted focus groups and interviews with 76 patients who had chronic conditions and got care at three safety net practices in Cleveland, Ohio. Of these patients, 41 were African American, 20 were white, 1 was Asian, 1 was multi-race, and 13 were unknown race. From the focus groups and interviews, the team created a list of patient-identified strengths relevant to managing chronic illness or improving health habits.

During the second phase, the research team invited 19 patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals to form a design team. The design team had 10 two-hour sessions to refine the list of strengths. With assistance from programmers, the design team developed a tablet-based app to help patients identify their personal strengths. The app included four videos of patients speaking about the importance of patients knowing their strengths. It directed patients to select their strengths from the design team’s list and rate the relevance of each strength to healthcare visits for chronic illnesses. The app then generated a prioritized list of the patient’s strengths to discuss during the healthcare visit. Finally, the design team identified clinical situations in which patient strengths would be particularly helpful.

Results

Patients reported 30 personal strengths in focus groups and interviews that fit into three categories:

  • Personal attributes, such as having a positive attitude
  • Interpersonal relationships, such as having support from family or friends
  • Access to community resources, such as knowing where to go when one has a health problem

The design team identified scenarios in which a strengths-based approach might be particularly helpful for patients. Examples included managing diabetes, managing chronic pain, and when patients frequently use health care.

Limitations

The research team tested the app only with patients who were members of the design team. As a result, the research did not demonstrate the usefulness of the app for other patients. The team also was not able to see if using patient strengths improved patient health.

Conclusions and Relevance

Patients could use the app to identify and prioritize personal strengths that may be useful in talking to healthcare providers about how to manage their chronic conditions.

Future Research Needs

Future research could determine if patients and clinicians can use the app beneficially in real-world clinical settings. Additional studies could also examine whether strengths-based care improves patient health outcomes.

Final Research Report

View this project's final research report.

Journal Articles

Related Articles

Health Expectations

Personal strengths reported by people with chronic illness: A qualitative study

More on this Project  

Peer-Review Summary

Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also confirms that the research has followed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts who were not members of the research team read a draft report of the research. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. Reviewers do not have conflicts of interest with the study.

The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve how the research team analyzed its results or reported its conclusions. Learn more about PCORI’s peer-review process here.

In response to peer review, the PI made changes including

  • Providing additional clarity about the unique roles of academic and community partners. Responding to reviewer questions about the membership in the Design Team and its differentiation from the research team, the researchers emphasized the participatory approaches used to make sure that everyone contributed to most aspects of the study.
  • Describing how the researchers made sure that members of the Design Team represented certain segments of their target population. The researchers indicated that patient stakeholders were recruited from safety net practice settings that focus on care for disadvantaged populations, in response to reviewers’ questions about representation of individuals from disadvantaged groups.
  • Explaining that the researchers were not able to achieve Objective 4 of the study, which was to quantitatively model outcomes of the strengths-based approach, because of the limited published data on patient-oriented outcomes from a strengths-based approach.
  • Clarifying for reviewers that this study was not meant to be hypothesis testing or based on formal experiments. Instead, the researchers aimed to convey the iterative nature of the tool development undertaken in the project by showing how one study objective led to the next.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

View the COI disclosure form.

Project Details

Principal Investigator
Kurt C. Stange, MD, PhD
Project Status
Completed; PCORI Public and Professional Abstracts, and Final Research Report Posted
Project Title
Patient-Identified Personal Strengths (PIPS) vs. Deficit-Focused Models of Care
Board Approval Date
December 2012
Project End Date
January 2018
Organization
Case Western Reserve University
Year Awarded
2012
State
Ohio
Year Completed
2018
Project Type
Research Project
Health Conditions  
Multiple/Comorbid Chronic Conditions
Intervention Strategies
Other Health Services Interventions
Technology Interventions
Populations
Individuals with Multiple Chronic/co-morbid Conditions
Low Income
Racial/Ethnic Minorities
Funding Announcement
Communication and Dissemination Research
Project Budget
$1,773,527
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
10.25302/3.2019.CER.732
Study Registration Information
HSRP20142263
Page Last Updated: 
September 21, 2020

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff
  • Our Vision & Mission
  • Contact Us

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Research Fundamentals
  • Research Results Highlights
  • Putting Evidence to Work
  • Peer Review
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • The Value of Engagement
  • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
  • Influencing the Culture of Research
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engagement Resources
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review
  • Awardee Resources
  • Help Center

Meetings & Events

March 8
Engagement Awards 2021 Special Cycle -- Applicant Office Hours (One)
March 15
Priorities on the Health Horizon: Informing PCORI's Strategic Plan (Webinar)
March 15
PCORI Workshop on Methodologic Challenges in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
[email protected]

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2021 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademark Usage Guidelines | Credits | Help Center