Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Find It Fast
  • Help Center
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • About Us
    Close mega-menu

    About Us

    • Our Programs
    • Governance
    • Financials and Reports
    • Procurement Opportunities
    • Our Staff
    • Our Vision & Mission
    • Contact Us

    Fact Sheets: Learn More About PCORI

    Download fact sheets about out work, the research we fund, and our programs and initiatives.

    Find It Fast

    Browse through an alphabetical list of frequently accessed and searched terms for information and resources.

    Subscribe to PCORI Email Alerts

    Sign up for weekly emails to stay current on the latest results of our funded projects, and more.

  • Research & Results
    Close mega-menu

    Research & Results

    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Research Fundamentals
    • Research Results Highlights
    • Putting Evidence to Work
    • Peer Review
    • Evidence Synthesis
    • About Our Research

    Evidence Updates from PCORI-Funded Studies

    These updates capture highlights of findings from systematic reviews and our funded research studies.

    Journal Articles About Our Funded Research

    Browse through a collection of journal publications that provides insights into PCORI-funded work.

    Explore Our Portfolio of Funded Projects

    Find out about projects based on the health conditions they focus on, the state they are in, and if they have results.

  • Topics
    Close mega-menu

    Topics

    • Addressing Disparities
    • Arthritis
    • Asthma
    • Cancer
    • Cardiovascular Disease
    • Children's Health
    • Community Health Workers
    • COVID-19
    • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment
    • Diabetes
    • Kidney Disease
    • Medicaid
    • Men's Health
    • Mental and Behavioral Health
    • Minority Mental Health
    • Multiple Chronic Conditions
    • Multiple Sclerosis
    • Obesity
    • Older Adults' Health
    • Pain Care and Opioids
    • Rare Diseases
    • Rural Health
    • Shared Decision Making
    • Telehealth
    • Transitional Care
    • Veterans Health
    • Women's Health

    Featured Topic: Women's Health

    Learn more about the projects we support on conditions that specifically or more often affect women.

  • Engagement
    Close mega-menu

    Engagement

    • The Value of Engagement
    • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
    • Influencing the Culture of Research
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engagement Resources
    • Engage with Us

    Engagement Tools and Resources for Research

    This searchable peer-to-peer repository includes resources that can inform future work in patient-centered outcomes research.

    Explore Engagement in Health Literature

    This tool enables searching for published articles about engagement in health research.

    Research Fundamentals: A New On-Demand Training

    It enables those new to health research or patient-centered research to learn more about the research process.

  • Funding Opportunities
    Close mega-menu

    Funding Opportunities

    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review
    • Awardee Resources
    • Help Center

    PCORI Funding Opportunities

    View and learn about the newly opened funding announcements and the upcoming PFAs in 2021.

    Tips for Submitting a Responsive LOI

    Find out what PCORI looks for in a letter of intent (LOI) along with other helpful tips.

    PCORI Awardee Resources

    These resources can help awardees in complying with the terms and conditions of their contract.

  • Meetings & Events
    Close mega-menu

    Meetings & Events

    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

    PCORI Webinar: February 2, 2pm ET

    Hear from PCORI leaders about ways to get involved in PCOR, improvements to our funding opportunities, and more. Register

    Confronting COVID-19: A Webinar Series

    Learn more about the series and access recordings and summary reports of all six sessions.

    2020 PCORI Annual Meeting

    Watch recordings of all sessions, and view titles and descriptions of the posters presented at the virtual meeting.

You are here

  • Research & Results
  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Can Nurse and Patient Education Reduc...

This project has results

Can Nurse and Patient Education Reduce Missed Doses of Medications to Prevent Blood Clots in Hospitals?

Sign Up for Updates to This Study  

Results Summary and Professional Abstract

Results Summary

Results Summary

Download Summary Español (pdf) Audio Recording (mp3)

What was the research about?

Blood clots that develop inside veins can cause serious health problems or even death. Although anyone can get a blood clot, more than half of blood clots happen after a hospital stay or surgery. Medicine to thin the blood can help prevent this problem, but missing even one dose can lead to blood clots. Hospitals want to do a better job of making sure patients don’t miss any doses.

The research team wanted to see if teaching hospital patients and nurses about medicine to prevent blood clots would lower the number of missed doses. Patient education took place right after a patient missed a dose of their medicine at the hospital. The team created three options to teach patients about blood clots. The patient could choose a 2-page handout, a 10-minute video, or talking with a patient educator. The research team also compared two ways to teach nurses about blood clots. One way was an interactive online training program. The other was an online training program that had a slide show with a voice recording.

What were the results?

Compared with patients who didn’t learn about blood clots, patients who learned about blood clots right after a missed dose were less likely to refuse medicine to prevent blood clots. They were also less likely to miss receiving the medicine for other reasons.

After nurses took part in training about how to prevent blood clots, fewer patients missed a dose of medicine to prevent blood clots compared to before the training. The study didn’t find that one way to train nurses was better than the other.

Who was in the study?

The study included 19,652 patient visits at a hospital in Baltimore, Maryland, who were prescribed medication to prevent blood clots. Half of the patients were men and half were women. Almost half of the patients were white, and a little less than half were African American.

The study also included 933 nurses who worked full-time at the hospital.

What did the research team do?

When a patient missed a dose of medicine to prevent blood clots, the research team received an alert. If a patient refused the medicine, the team asked the patient if he or she wanted to learn about blood clots and why taking the medicine is important. If a patient missed their medicine for a reason other than refusing it, then the research team told the patient’s nurse to make sure the patient received their medicine. The research team counted the patients who took or refused the medicine before and after the hospital offered to teach patients about blood clots.

Nurses took one of the two online training programs about medicine to prevent blood clots. After the training, the research team looked at how many times the nurses’ patients missed a dose of medicine to prevent blood clots.

What were the limits of the study?

This study took place at one hospital. The results may not be the same at other hospitals. Not all patients who missed their medicine for blood clots took part in the study. Some patients went home before the research team could talk with them, and others didn’t want to be part of the study.

Future research could test the nurse training and patient education at different types of hospitals and in different locations.

How can people use the results?

These results show that when patients and nurses know more about blood clots and how to prevent them with medicine, patients are less likely to miss doses of this medicine. Hospitals can consider teaching patients who don’t take their medicine about how to avoid blood clots right after patients refuse their medicine. Hospitals can also consider training for nurses.

Professional Abstract

Professional Abstract

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of usual care versus educational interventions for nurses and patients on nonadministration and patient refusal of anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention among hospitalized patient.

Study Design

Design Element Description
Design

Nurse educational intervention: randomized controlled trial

Patient educational intervention: controlled pre- versus postintervention comparison

Population

Nurse educational intervention: 933 internal medicine and surgical nurses

Patient educational intervention: 19,652 patient visits in which the patient was prescribed at least 1 dose of anticoagulant for VTE prevention

Interventions/
Comparators
  • Nurse educational intervention: static versus interactive educational intervention
  • Patient educational intervention: usual care versus 3-component patient-education bundle delivered in response to a real-time alert
Outcomes

Primary: overall proportion of anticoagulants not administered

Secondary: proportion of anticoagulants not administered due to refusal by patients or family

Timeframe 12-month follow-up for primary outcome

This study included two components:

  • A double-blind cluster randomized controlled trial of two web-based modules—static versus interactive—to educate nurses about the harms of VTE, the benefits and risks of anticoagulants, and strategies for communicating with patients about anticoagulants
  • A controlled pre- versus postintervention comparison of a patient-education bundle delivered when a patient missed a prescribed dose of anticoagulants

The primary outcome for both study components was the proportion of anticoagulants not administered. The secondary outcome for both study components was the proportion of anticoagulants not administered due to refusal by patients or family.

The nurse education study included 933 permanent nursing staff from the departments of internal medicine and surgery at a hospital in Baltimore, Maryland. The research team cluster randomized nurses by floor to receive one of two online trainings on anticoagulants: a static PowerPoint presentation with a voiceover to present concepts, or a dynamic module with positive reinforcement and corrective feedback. The research team monitored anticoagulant administration practices using electronic health records over one year, stratified into time periods: baseline (preintervention) and postintervention.

The patient-education study included hospitalized patients on 16 adult nonintensive care nursing floors of the hospital. There were 4 intervention floors and 12 control floors. Patients were close to evenly split between men and women in the intervention and control groups. Almost half were white and a little less than half were African American. In response to a real-time alert, patients on intervention floors who missed a dose of anticoagulants received at least one component of an educational bundle, according to their preference. The patient-education bundle included a one-on-one conversation with a health-educator nurse, a 2-page paper handout, and a 10-minute video. Patients on control floors received usual care. The research team compared anticoagulants not administered pre- and postintervention.

Patients and caregivers, some of whom had experience with VTE, and other stakeholders helped create the educational materials.

Results

Nurse educational intervention.

  • Medication not administered. Among nurses in either education arm, the proportion of nonadministration was significantly lower following nurse education (12.4% versus 11.1%, conditional odds ratio (OR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.80-0.95, p=0.002). The difference between the dynamic and static arms was not statistically significant.
  • Medication not administered because of patient refusal. Following nurse education, there was no change overall or in either education arm in the proportion of doses that patients or family refused.

Patient educational intervention.

  • Medication not administered. The odds of missing doses of anticoagulants declined by 43% on intervention floors (OR 0.57, 95% CI, 0.48-0.67). There was no change on control floors (OR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.91-1.07).
  • Medication not administered because of patient refusal. The odds of missing doses of anticoagulants due to patient or family refusal decreased by 47% on intervention floors (OR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.43-0.65). There was no change in patient or family refusal of doses on control floors (OR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.89-1.08).

Limitations

The study took place at only one hospital, so results may not be generalizable to other hospitals. For the patient-education component, not all patients who missed doses took part in the study; the hospital discharged some patients before the intervention began, and others were unable or unwilling to meet with a health-educator nurse.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that both nurse and patient education reduced nonadministration of anticoagulants. The study did not find evidence that one type of nurse education is better than another, because both reduced the proportion of missed doses among patients.

Future Research Needs

Future research could examine optimal strategies for training nurses or the effect of nurse- or patient-education interventions on VTE events. Future research could also focus on implementing the education interventions in hospitals in other locations.

Final Research Report

View this project's final research report.

Related PCORI Dissemination and Implementation Projects

Preventing Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): Engaging Patients to Reduce Preventable Harm from Missed/Refused Doses of VTE Prophylaxis

Implementing Best-Practice, Patient-Centered Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prevention in Trauma Centers

Journal Articles

Results of This Project

JAMA Network Open

Effect of Real-time Patient-Centered Education Bundle on Administration of Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Hospitalized Patients

Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management

The role of extended/outpatient venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after abdominal surgery for cancer or inflammatory bowel disease

PLoS One

Effectiveness of two distinct web-based education tools for bedside nurses on medication administration practice for venous thromboembolism prevention: A randomized clinical trial

The Journal of Surgical Research

Beneficial "halo effects" of surgical resident performance feedback

JAMA Surgery

Preventability of Hospital-Acquired Venous Thromboembolism

Related Articles

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Missed Doses of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: a Growing Problem Without an Active Management Strategy

Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management

Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review Update [Internet].

Blood Advances

What the 2018 ASH venous thromboembolism guidelines omitted: nonadministration of pharmacologic prophylaxis in hospitalized patients

JAMA Surgery

Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Emergency General Surgery: A Review

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Missed Doses of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis at Community Hospitals: Cause for Alarm

Journal of Hospital Medicine

The Johns Hopkins Venous Thromboembolism Collaborative: Multidisciplinary team approach to achieve perfect prophylaxis

Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

Is the Meaningful Use Venous Thromboembolism VTE-6 Measure Meaningful? A Retrospective Analysis of One Hospital's VTE-6 Cases

PLoS One

Patient Preferences for Receiving Education on Venous Thromboembolism Prevention – A Survey of Stakeholder Organizations

More on this Project  

PCORI Stories

Improving Patient-Nurse Communication to Prevent a Life-Threatening Complication
A narrative about a Baltimore team of researchers that is exploring how to ensure wider use of preventive measures for hospitalized patients who are at high risk for potentially fatal blood clots in their legs and lungs.

Preventing Life-Threatening Blood Clots
An update to the narrative on this study, highlighting that researchers found success in educating hospitalized patients about the importance of preventive treatment.

Videos

Educating Patients and Nurses to Help Reduce Blood Clots
PCORI-funded researcher Elliott Haut led a team that tested an education program for patients and nurses about the importance of taking blood-thinning drugs to prevent blood clots. The team found that the education program cut the number of missed doses by half.

Peer-Review Summary

Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also confirms that the research has followed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts who were not members of the research team read a draft report of the research. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. Reviewers do not have conflicts of interest with the study.

The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve how the research team analyzed its results or reported its conclusions. Learn more about PCORI’s peer review process here.

In response to peer review, the PI made changes including

  • Explaining that while nurse participants knew that they were receiving education about prevention of venous thrombosis, they did not know that there were two different educational modules of which they were assigned only one. 
  • Streamlining the Results section to be more readable and presenting a simplified summary of the results for readers without extensive statistical training
  • Including plans for dissemination of the findings in the Discussion section

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

View the COI disclosure form.

Project Details

Principal Investigator
Elliott R. Haut, MD, PhD
Project Status
Completed; PCORI Public and Professional Abstracts, and Final Research Report Posted
Project Title
Preventing Venous Thromboembolism: Empowering Patients and Enabling Patient-Centered Care via Health Information Technology
Board Approval Date
May 2013
Project End Date
May 2017
Organization
Johns Hopkins University
Year Awarded
2013
State
Maryland
Year Completed
2017
Project Type
Research Project
Health Conditions  
Cardiovascular Diseases
Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolism
Intervention Strategies
Drug Interventions
Technology Interventions
Training and Education Interventions
Populations
Racial/Ethnic Minorities
Women
Funding Announcement
Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options
Project Budget
$1,536,559
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
10.25302/11.2018.CE.12114489
Study Registration Information
HSRP20143176
NCT02301793
Page Last Updated: 
June 23, 2020

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff
  • Our Vision & Mission
  • Contact Us

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Research Fundamentals
  • Research Results Highlights
  • Putting Evidence to Work
  • Peer Review
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • The Value of Engagement
  • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
  • Influencing the Culture of Research
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engagement Resources
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review
  • Awardee Resources
  • Help Center

Meetings & Events

February 2
PCORI 2021 and Beyond: Opportunities for Funding and Involvement in Patient-Centered Research
February 9
Board of Governors Meeting: February 9, 2021
February 11
Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement Winter 2021 Meeting

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
[email protected]

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2021 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademark Usage Guidelines | Credits | Help Center