Final Research Report

View this project's final research report.

Stories and Videos

Media Mentions

Chicago Hospitals Form Partnership to Battle Asthma 'Hot Spots'
Chicago Sun-Times, May 9, 2018

This article describes this PCORI-funded study, which found that families of children who visited the emergency room for asthma and who received extra help were better able to manage prescriptions and subsequent doctor visits than those who didn’t receive additional support. “We work as a team, around the clock,” one caregiver involved in the program tells the newspaper. “Once we learned the triggers for each child’s asthma, we have been able to manage it more effectively. You have to be proactive.”

Peer-Review Summary

Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also assesses how the project addressed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts read a draft report of the research and provide comments about the report. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. These reviewers cannot have conflicts of interest with the study.

The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve descriptions of the conduct of the study or to clarify the connection between results and conclusions. Sometimes, awardees revise their draft reports twice or more to address all of the reviewers’ comments. 

Peer reviewers commented, and the researchers made changes or provided responses. The comments and responses included the following:

In general, the reviews were positive regarding the study’s conduct. Reviewer criticisms focused on seeking greater clarity and explanation in the text. In particular, reviewers asked for more detail on the interventions and how the researchers sought to maximize retention of project participants. The researchers revised the report to include additional description and discussion.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Project Information

Jerry A. Krishnan, MD, PhD
University of Illinois at Chicago
$4,075,144
10.25302/01.2020.AS.130705420
The Coordinated Healthcare Interventions for Childhood Asthma Gaps in Outcomes (CHICAGO) Trial

Key Dates

December 2013
October 2018
2013
2018

Study Registration Information

Tags

Has Results
Award Type
Health Conditions Health Conditions These are the broad terms we use to categorize our funded research studies; specific diseases or conditions are included within the appropriate larger category. Note: not all of our funded projects focus on a single disease or condition; some touch on multiple diseases or conditions, research methods, or broader health system interventions. Such projects won’t be listed by a primary disease/condition and so won’t appear if you use this filter tool to find them. View Glossary
Populations Populations PCORI is interested in research that seeks to better understand how different clinical and health system options work for different people. These populations are frequently studied in our portfolio or identified as being of interest by our stakeholders. View Glossary
Intervention Strategy Intervention Strategies PCORI funds comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) studies that compare two or more options or approaches to health care, or that compare different ways of delivering or receiving care. View Glossary
Research Priority Area
State State The state where the project originates, or where the primary institution or organization is located. View Glossary
Last updated: April 11, 2022