Final Research Report
View this project's final research report.
More to Explore...
Related PCORI Dissemination and Implementation Project
Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also assesses how the project addressed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts read a draft report of the research and provide comments about the report. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. These reviewers cannot have conflicts of interest with the study.
The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve descriptions of the conduct of the study or to clarify the connection between results and conclusions. Sometimes, awardees revise their draft reports twice or more to address all of the reviewers’ comments.
Peer reviewers found the study to be statistically sound and to address an important issue. The reviewers did note the complexity of the language describing the study’s psychometric methods. The researchers said it would be hard to satisfy both experts in the field and general scientists while staying within the page limit, but they provided an expanded glossary.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures
Study Registration Information
- Has Results