Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Find It Fast
  • Help Center
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • About Us
    Close mega-menu

    About Us

    • Our Programs
    • Governance
    • Financials and Reports
    • Procurement Opportunities
    • Our Staff
    • Our Vision & Mission
    • Contact Us

    Fact Sheets: Learn More About PCORI

    Download fact sheets about out work, the research we fund, and our programs and initiatives.

    Find It Fast

    Browse through an alphabetical list of frequently accessed and searched terms for information and resources.

    Subscribe to PCORI Email Alerts

    Sign up for weekly emails to stay current on the latest results of our funded projects, and more.

  • Research & Results
    Close mega-menu

    Research & Results

    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Research Fundamentals
    • Research Results Highlights
    • Putting Evidence to Work
    • Peer Review
    • Evidence Synthesis
    • About Our Research

    Evidence Updates from PCORI-Funded Studies

    These updates capture highlights of findings from systematic reviews and our funded research studies.

    Journal Articles About Our Funded Research

    Browse through a collection of journal publications that provides insights into PCORI-funded work.

    Explore Our Portfolio of Funded Projects

    Find out about projects based on the health conditions they focus on, the state they are in, and if they have results.

  • Topics
    Close mega-menu

    Topics

    • Addressing Disparities
    • Arthritis
    • Asthma
    • Cancer
    • Cardiovascular Disease
    • Children's Health
    • Community Health Workers
    • COVID-19
    • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment
    • Diabetes
    • Kidney Disease
    • Medicaid
    • Men's Health
    • Mental and Behavioral Health
    • Minority Mental Health
    • Multiple Chronic Conditions
    • Multiple Sclerosis
    • Obesity
    • Older Adults' Health
    • Pain Care and Opioids
    • Rare Diseases
    • Rural Health
    • Shared Decision Making
    • Telehealth
    • Transitional Care
    • Veterans Health
    • Women's Health

    Featured Topic: Women's Health

    Learn more about the projects we support on conditions that specifically or more often affect women.

  • Engagement
    Close mega-menu

    Engagement

    • The Value of Engagement
    • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
    • Influencing the Culture of Research
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engagement Resources
    • Engage with Us

    Engagement Tools and Resources for Research

    This searchable peer-to-peer repository includes resources that can inform future work in patient-centered outcomes research.

    Explore Engagement in Health Literature

    This tool enables searching for published articles about engagement in health research.

    Research Fundamentals: A New On-Demand Training

    It enables those new to health research or patient-centered research to learn more about the research process.

  • Funding Opportunities
    Close mega-menu

    Funding Opportunities

    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review
    • Awardee Resources
    • Help Center

    PCORI Funding Opportunities

    View and learn about the newly opened funding announcements and the upcoming PFAs in 2021.

    Tips for Submitting a Responsive LOI

    Find out what PCORI looks for in a letter of intent (LOI) along with other helpful tips.

    PCORI Awardee Resources

    These resources can help awardees in complying with the terms and conditions of their contract.

  • Meetings & Events
    Close mega-menu

    Meetings & Events

    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

    January 2021 Board of Governors Meeting

    The Board approved funding for a new research study relating to kidney health and a new funding allocation for PCORnet. Learn more

    Confronting COVID-19: A Webinar Series

    Learn more about the series and access recordings and summary reports of all six sessions.

    2020 PCORI Annual Meeting

    Watch recordings of all sessions, and view titles and descriptions of the posters presented at the virtual meeting.

You are here

  • Research & Results
  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Does an Offer by Phone of Community H...

This project has results

Does an Offer by Phone of Community Health Worker Support Increase Access to Primary Care for Women Who Are Newly Enrolled in a Health Plan?

Sign Up for Updates to This Study  

Results Summary and Professional Abstract

Results Summary

Results Summary

Download Summary Español (pdf) Audio Recording (mp3)

What was the research about?

Medicaid is public health insurance for people who don’t have insurance and can’t afford to pay for it on their own. Women who are new to Medicaid may need help getting care from a primary care doctor, such as regular checkups or vaccines.

In this study, the research team wanted to learn if an offer by phone for support from a community health worker helped women new to a Medicaid health plan get care. Community health workers teach people about health and link them to health services. The team compared two groups of women. In one group, health plan staff called women and offered assistance from a community health worker. In the other group, women didn’t receive a call offering community health worker assistance. All women in the study got standard health plan information.

What were the results?

Overall, the study found no difference in getting care from a primary care doctor between women that health plan staff called and those who they didn’t call. However, health plan staff couldn’t reach 78 percent of the women they called.

Who was in the study?

The study included 2,267 women ages 18 to 39 who had just joined the University Family Care Medicaid health plan in southern Arizona. Of these, 39 percent were white, 15 percent were other races, 32 percent were Hispanic, and 14 percent didn’t indicate a race or ethnicity. The average age was 27.

What did the research team do?

The research team assigned women to one of two groups by chance. Health plan staff called women in the first group to offer them help from a community health worker. Staff tried calling women three times. They called at different times and days of the week and left a message if no one answered the phone. The second group didn’t get a phone call from health plan staff. After six months, the team looked at healthcare records for women in both groups to see if the groups differed in whether they got care from a primary care doctor.

What were the limits of the study?

The research team designed the study to look at whether the offer of community health worker support was helpful to women in getting primary care. The study didn’t compare women who worked with community health workers with those who didn’t.

Future studies could look at other ways to offer help to women new to Medicaid.

How can people use the results?

Health plans could consider the results from this study when deciding how to offer help to new members.

Professional Abstract

Professional Abstract

Objective

To examine whether a health plan’s offer of support from a trained community health worker (CHW) helped women newly enrolled in Medicaid to access primary care and preventive services

Study Design

Design Elements Description
Design Randomized controlled trial
Population 2,267 women ages 18–39 newly enrolled in the University Family Care (UFC) Medicaid health plan for people living in southern Arizona
Interventions/
Comparators
  • Health plan’s phone offer of education and navigation support from a CHW
  • Standard information offered by the health plan 
Outcomes

Primary: use of a primary care provider, defined as at least 1 visit to a primary care provider in the first 6 months after enrollment

Secondary: receipt of recommended preventive services (defined as at least 1 visit for immunizations or any of 5 reproductive screenings recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force), avoidable emergency department visits and hospitalizations (defined as the number of emergency department or hospital visits for conditions that a primary care physician could have appropriately managed)

Timeframe 6-month follow-up for primary outcome

This randomized controlled trial examined whether offering CHW education and navigation support to women who recently enrolled in a large Arizona Medicaid health plan helped these women access primary care.

The study included 2,267 women ages 18 to 39 living in southern Arizona and newly enrolled in the University Family Care (UFC) Medicaid health plan. All women in the study had access to standard health plan information. The health plan randomly selected 1,521 women to receive a telephone call offering them CHW services. UFC call center staff attempted to contact these women three times and left recorded messages when calls were not answered. For women who were reachable by phone, staff offered CHW services including a 30-minute in-person planning session to discuss preventive services and educational resources and two follow-up calls. The remaining 746 women did not receive an offer to use CHW services.

Among study participants, 39% were white, 15% identified as other race, 32% were Hispanic, and 14% did not indicate a race or ethnicity. The average age was 27.

Using six months of Medicaid data, the research team examined differences in healthcare utilization between the women selected to receive the telephone offer of CHW services and those not selected.

An advisory board of UFC administrators, providers, and patients and representatives from the REACH Pima County Cervical Cancer Prevention Partnership and the Arizona Community Health Workers Association provided input to the research team during the study.

Results

Of the 1,521 women randomized to receive a telephone call offering CHW services, 78% were not reached by phone. Of the 331 women successfully contacted by phone, 48% accepted the offer and received support from a CHW.

Primary care use, receipt of recommended preventive services or immunizations, and avoidable emergency department visits and hospitalizations did not differ between the women in the group selected to receive an offer of CHW services and those not selected.

Limitations

UFC staff were unable to contact most of the women randomized to receive a call offering CHW services. As a result, the actual number of women who accepted the offer of CHW support was small; this may explain the study results. The study did not examine healthcare utilization outcomes for women who received CHW support compared with other study participants.

Conclusions and Relevance

Relying on phone contact information from the UFC health plan to offer additional services to Medicaid enrollees was ineffective. Combining telephone contact with other outreach methods may be more effective.

Future Research Needs

Future studies could examine other ways for health plans to offer support to new enrollees, such as through direct interaction with patients in local clinics or hospitals, or multimodal attempts to reach patients, such as texting, emailing, and direct mail in addition to telephone contact.

Final Research Report

View this project's final research report.

More on this Project  

Peer-Review Summary

Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also assesses how the project addressed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts read a draft report of the research and provide comments about the report. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. These reviewers cannot have conflicts of interest with the study.

The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve descriptions of the conduct of the study or to clarify the connection between results and conclusions. Sometimes, awardees revise their draft reports twice or more to address all of the reviewers’ comments. 

Peer reviewers commented and the researchers made changes or provided responses. Those comments and responses included the following:

  • Reviewers noted that the report’s conclusions overstated the success of the intervention since most of the differences favoring the intervention were not statistically significant. The researchers explained that since the nonsignificant findings were in one direction, it was reasonable to assume that the intervention had some effect. However, with further urging from reviewers, the researchers removed the assertions that the intervention affected outcomes despite the lack of statistically significant differences.
  • Reviewers pointed out that a major finding of the study related to the reachability of study participants, rather than the intervention outcomes. The researchers acknowledged this point and added language to their report describing their lessons learned about contacting and engaging participants. The researchers argued further that despite the very low participation and completion rates for the intervention and control groups, the results could be generalizable to other populations.
  • Reviewers expressed concern about the potential for post-randomization selection bias. The study randomized participants before inviting them to the program itself, which meant that people who entered the program could differ from those who did not, as well as from those participants randomized to the uninvited group. Therefore, it is possible that the benefits seen in the intervention group were because the participants who were easier to contact to issue the invitation to were also those who would respond better to the intervention. The researchers acknowledged this potential confounder but were not comfortable concluding that the observed benefit among program recipients was due entirely to the ease of contacting such recipients about participating in the program. However, the researchers revised their conclusions to acknowledge the potential effect of selection bias for as-treated analyses.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

View the COI disclosure form.

Project Details

Principal Investigator
Francisco Garcia, MD, MPH
Project Status
Completed; PCORI Public and Professional Abstracts, and Final Research Report Posted
Project Title
Connecting Healthy Women
Board Approval Date
December 2013
Project End Date
October 2018
Organization
University of Arizona
Year Awarded
2013
State
Arizona
Year Completed
2018
Project Type
Research Project
Health Conditions  
Cancer
Cervical Cancer
Infectious Diseases
HPV and other Sexually Transmitted Infections
Reproductive and Perinatal Health
Contraceptive Care
Mental/Behavioral Health
Intervention Strategies
Care Coordination
Other Health Services Interventions
Patient Navigation
Training and Education Interventions
Populations
Racial/Ethnic Minorities
Low Health Literacy/Numeracy
Low Income
Rural
Women
Urban
Funding Announcement
Improving Healthcare Systems
Project Budget
$1,228,632
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
10.25302/10.2019.IHS.130604356
Study Registration Information
HSRP20143572
NCT02157168
Page Last Updated: 
February 20, 2020

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff
  • Our Vision & Mission
  • Contact Us

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Research Fundamentals
  • Research Results Highlights
  • Putting Evidence to Work
  • Peer Review
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • The Value of Engagement
  • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
  • Influencing the Culture of Research
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engagement Resources
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review
  • Awardee Resources
  • Help Center

Meetings & Events

January 21
Cycle 1 2021 Broad PFA Applicant Town Hall
February 2
PCORI 2021 and Beyond: Opportunities for Funding and Involvement in Patient-Centered Research
February 9
Board of Governors Meeting: February 9, 2021

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
[email protected]

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2021 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademark Usage Guidelines | Credits | Help Center