Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Find It Fast
  • Help Center
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • About Us
    Close mega-menu

    About Us

    • Our Programs
    • Governance
    • Financials and Reports
    • Procurement Opportunities
    • Our Staff
    • Our Vision & Mission
    • Contact Us

    Fact Sheets: Learn More About PCORI

    Download fact sheets about out work, the research we fund, and our programs and initiatives.

    Find It Fast

    Browse through an alphabetical list of frequently accessed and searched terms for information and resources.

    Subscribe to PCORI Email Alerts

    Sign up for weekly emails to stay current on the latest results of our funded projects, and more.

  • Research & Results
    Close mega-menu

    Research & Results

    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Research Fundamentals
    • Research Results Highlights
    • Putting Evidence to Work
    • Peer Review
    • Evidence Synthesis
    • About Our Research

    Evidence Updates from PCORI-Funded Studies

    These updates capture highlights of findings from systematic reviews and our funded research studies.

    Journal Articles About Our Funded Research

    Browse through a collection of journal publications that provides insights into PCORI-funded work.

    Explore Our Portfolio of Funded Projects

    Find out about projects based on the health conditions they focus on, the state they are in, and if they have results.

  • Topics
    Close mega-menu

    Topics

    • Addressing Disparities
    • Arthritis
    • Asthma
    • Cancer
    • Cardiovascular Disease
    • Children's Health
    • Community Health Workers
    • COVID-19
    • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment
    • Diabetes
    • Kidney Disease
    • Medicaid
    • Men's Health
    • Mental and Behavioral Health
    • Minority Mental Health
    • Multiple Chronic Conditions
    • Multiple Sclerosis
    • Obesity
    • Older Adults' Health
    • Pain Care and Opioids
    • Rare Diseases
    • Rural Health
    • Shared Decision Making
    • Telehealth
    • Transitional Care
    • Veterans Health
    • Women's Health

    Featured Topic: Women's Health

    Learn more about the projects we support on conditions that specifically or more often affect women.

  • Engagement
    Close mega-menu

    Engagement

    • The Value of Engagement
    • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
    • Influencing the Culture of Research
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engagement Resources
    • Engage with Us

    Engagement Tools and Resources for Research

    This searchable peer-to-peer repository includes resources that can inform future work in patient-centered outcomes research.

    Explore Engagement in Health Literature

    This tool enables searching for published articles about engagement in health research.

    Research Fundamentals: A New On-Demand Training

    It enables those new to health research or patient-centered research to learn more about the research process.

  • Funding Opportunities
    Close mega-menu

    Funding Opportunities

    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review
    • Awardee Resources
    • Help Center

    PCORI Funding Opportunities

    View and learn about the newly opened funding announcements and the upcoming PFAs in 2021.

    Tips for Submitting a Responsive LOI

    Find out what PCORI looks for in a letter of intent (LOI) along with other helpful tips.

    PCORI Awardee Resources

    These resources can help awardees in complying with the terms and conditions of their contract.

  • Meetings & Events
    Close mega-menu

    Meetings & Events

    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

    January 2021 Board of Governors Meeting

    The Board approved funding for a new research study relating to kidney health and a new funding allocation for PCORnet. Learn more

    Confronting COVID-19: A Webinar Series

    Learn more about the series and access recordings and summary reports of all six sessions.

    2020 PCORI Annual Meeting

    Watch recordings of all sessions, and view titles and descriptions of the posters presented at the virtual meeting.

You are here

  • Research & Results
  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Evaluating a Program to Improve Patie...

This project has results

Evaluating a Program to Improve Patient Experiences after Discharge from the Hospital -- The PArTNER Study

Sign Up for Updates to This Study  

Results Summary and Professional Abstract

Results Summary

Results Summary

Download Summary Español (pdf) Audio Recording (mp3)

What was the research about?

When patients go home from the hospital, having information about what to expect is important for their recovery. Patients may need to know how to plan follow-up care or get help from community organizations.

In this study, the research team compared two ways to help people recover at home after a hospital stay:

  • Navigator and peer coach program. In this program, two types of trained professionals helped patients. Patient navigators met with patients once, in person, at the hospital and once at home to talk about patients’ recovery needs. For example, if patients needed help with housing or food, navigators told patients about community resources. Then, peer coaches checked in with patients by phone for six weeks. Peer coaches encouraged patients and helped them with any new questions about their illnesses or their recovery.
  • Usual care. Patients learned about their illnesses and went over their medicines with a nurse at the hospital. They also received printed instructions before they left the hospital.

What were the results?

After two months, patients in the two groups reported similar levels of

  • Feeling anxious or supported
  • Mental or physical health
  • Use of healthcare services

The two groups also didn’t differ in how many patients went back to the hospital or died.

After one month, compared to the start of the study, patients in both groups felt less anxious and more supported. After two months, patients in both groups had better mental and physical health.

Who was in the study?

The study included 1,029 patients who were going home from a hospital in Illinois. Of these, 82 percent were black. The average age was 50, and 55 percent were women. Patients were at the hospital for one of five health problems: sickle cell disease, heart failure, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or a heart attack.

What did the research team do?

The research team assigned patients to one of two groups by chance. One group took part in the program, and the other group received usual care.

Patients in both groups took surveys while they were in the hospital and again one and two months after they got home. The research team looked at patients’ health records to see who returned to the hospital within two months after going home.

Patients, caregivers, advocacy groups, and doctors helped design the study.

What were the limits of the study?

Peer coaches couldn’t reach 40 percent of patients in the program because patients didn’t answer the phone or respond to messages. Results may differ if more patients connect with peer coaches. The study only included patients receiving care from one hospital in Illinois. Results may differ for people in other places.

Future research could look at other ways to support patients after they leave the hospital.

How can people use the results?

Hospitals can use these results when considering ways to support patients recovering at home.

Professional Abstract

Professional Abstract

Objective

To test the effectiveness of a patient navigation and peer coaching intervention on improving patient experiences following discharge from the hospital

Study Design

Design Elements Description
Design Randomized controlled trial
Population 1,029 patients hospitalized with a heart failure, pneumonia, COPD, myocardial infarction, or sickle cell disease diagnosis
Interventions/
Comparators
  • In-person patient navigator assistance and telephone peer coaching
  • Usual care
Outcomes

Primary: patient-reported anxiety; patient-reported informational support, defined as the ability to obtain advice, guidance, suggestions, or useful information

Secondary: patient-reported mental and physical health; healthcare utilization, including an outpatient visit within 14 days of hospital discharge; ED visit, rehospitalization, or death within 30 or 60 days of discharge

Timeframe 60-day follow-up for primary outcomes

The PATient Navigator to rEduce Readmissions (PArTNER) study compared the effectiveness of a navigator and peer coaching intervention with usual care on improving patient experiences during transition from hospital to home.

Researchers randomly assigned patients to receive the navigator intervention or usual care prior to discharge from the hospital. In the intervention group, two trained individuals—a patient navigator and a peer coach—interacted with patients. Navigators visited patients assigned to the intervention in person before discharge and again within three days after discharge. They helped patients identify barriers to health and health care, reviewed a patient discharge education tool, offered community resources if needed, and promoted self-management skills. Then, peer coaches called patients weekly for up to 60 days after discharge, focusing on overcoming barriers to care and promoting self-management of health.

In usual care, clinical staff provided medication reconciliation on the day of discharge, along with education about the patient’s condition, disease management, medications, and self-care. Patients received a structured discharge summary at the time of discharge.

At baseline prior to discharge and then 30 and 60 days after discharge, researchers collected data on anxiety and informational support using patient-reported outcome measures and assessed healthcare utilization using patients’ medical records.

The study included 1,029 patients receiving care at a hospital in Illinois for heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, myocardial infarction, or sickle cell disease. Of these patients, 82% were black. The average age was 50, and 55% were female.

An advisory committee of patients, caregivers, advocacy groups, clinicians, and researchers helped design the intervention and define study outcomes. Patient advocates served as peer coaches in the study.

Results

At 30 and 60 days after discharge, patients in the navigator program and patients receiving usual care did not differ significantly in the amount of improvement in study outcomes. Compared with baseline, patients in both groups reported improvement in

  • Anxiety and information support after 30 days (p<0.01)
  • Mental health at 60 days (p<0.01)
  • Physical health at 30 and 60 days (p<0.01)

Limitations

About 40% of patients did not receive calls from peer coaches due to patient nonresponse. Findings may be different if more patients had participated in the intervention. The study took place at a single hospital. The results may not be generalizable to other locations.

Conclusions and Relevance

A patient navigator and peer coaching intervention for hospital-to-home transitions did not improve anxiety and informational support more than usual care.

Future Research Needs

Future research could explore other interventions that might improve patient experiences after hospital discharge.

Final Research Report

View this project's final research report.

Journal Articles

Related Articles

Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications

Design of the patient navigator to reduce readmissions (PArTNER) study: A pragmatic clinical effectiveness trial

Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications

Design of thepatient navigator to reduce readmissions (PArTNER) study: A pragmatic clinical effectiveness trial

Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

Engaging Patients and Caregivers to Design Transitional Care Management Services at a Minority Serving Institution

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

CAPriCORN: Chicago Area Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network

Annals of the American Thoracic Society

Interventions to reduce rehospitalizations after chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations

More on this Project  

PCORI Stories

In Care Transitions, a Chance to Make or Break Patients' Recovery
A narrative on what happens when patients are harmed by poorly executed transitions between healthcare settings.

Peer-Review Summary

Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also assesses how the project addressed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts read a draft report of the research and provide comments about the report. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. These reviewers cannot have conflicts of interest with the study.

The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve descriptions of the conduct of the study or to clarify the connection between results and conclusions. Sometimes, awardees revise their draft reports twice or more to address all of the reviewers’ comments. 

Peer reviewers commented, and the researchers made changes or provided responses. The comments and responses included the following:

  • Overall, the reviewers found the report to be commendable, well organized, and clearly written, requiring only minor revisions.
  • Reviewers noted that the lack of fidelity testing of the intervention led to a number of participants not receiving the complete study intervention. The researchers responded that they designed the study with the constraints of routine clinical practice in mind, taking into consideration some of the challenges likely to occur in implementing such an intervention in clinical settings. However, they also agreed that future efforts should have greater emphasis on early fidelity testing to identify potential barriers to intervention implementation.
  • A reviewer commented that lack of oversight of telephone coaches allowed too many participants to not receive the intervention. The researchers noted that members of patient advocacy organizations performed the telephone coaching rather than study personnel or hospital staff. The researchers agreed that real-time monitoring and feedback during the intervention could have been helpful. They also added this point to the discussion. 

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

View the COI disclosure form.

Project Details

Principal Investigator
Jerry Krishnan, MD, PhD
Project Status
Completed; PCORI Public and Professional Abstracts, and Final Research Report Posted
Project Title
PATient Navigator to rEduce Readmissions -- The PArTNER Study
Board Approval Date
May 2013
Project End Date
November 2018
Organization
University of Illinois at Chicago
Year Awarded
2013
State
Illinois
Year Completed
2018
Project Type
Research Project
Health Conditions  
Blood Disorders
Sickle Cell Disease
Cardiovascular Diseases
Coronary or Ischemic Heart Disease
Congestive Heart Failure
Multiple/Comorbid Chronic Conditions
Respiratory Diseases
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Respiratory Infections
Intervention Strategies
Patient Navigation
Other Health Services Interventions
Technology Interventions
Training and Education Interventions
Populations
Children -- 18 and under
Low Health Literacy/Numeracy
Low Income
Racial/Ethnic Minorities
Urban
Funding Announcement
Improving Healthcare Systems
Project Budget
$2,054,803
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
10.25302/04.2020.IH.12114365
Study Registration Information
HSRP20143142
NCT02114515
Page Last Updated: 
May 15, 2020

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff
  • Our Vision & Mission
  • Contact Us

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Research Fundamentals
  • Research Results Highlights
  • Putting Evidence to Work
  • Peer Review
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • The Value of Engagement
  • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
  • Influencing the Culture of Research
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engagement Resources
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review
  • Awardee Resources
  • Help Center

Meetings & Events

January 21
Cycle 1 2021 Broad PFA Applicant Town Hall
February 2
PCORI 2021 and Beyond: Opportunities for Funding and Involvement in Patient-Centered Research
February 9
Board of Governors Meeting: February 9, 2021

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
[email protected]

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2021 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademark Usage Guidelines | Credits | Help Center