Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Find It Fast
  • Help Center
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • About Us
    Close mega-menu

    About Us

    • Our Programs
    • Governance
    • Financials and Reports
    • Procurement Opportunities
    • Our Staff
    • Our Vision & Mission
    • Contact Us

    Fact Sheets: Learn More About PCORI

    Download fact sheets about out work, the research we fund, and our programs and initiatives.

    Find It Fast

    Browse through an alphabetical list of frequently accessed and searched terms for information and resources.

    Subscribe to PCORI Email Alerts

    Sign up for weekly emails to stay current on the latest results of our funded projects, and more.

  • Research & Results
    Close mega-menu

    Research & Results

    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Research Fundamentals
    • Research Results Highlights
    • Putting Evidence to Work
    • Peer Review
    • Evidence Synthesis
    • About Our Research

    Evidence Updates from PCORI-Funded Studies

    These updates capture highlights of findings from systematic reviews and our funded research studies.

    Journal Articles About Our Funded Research

    Browse through a collection of journal publications that provides insights into PCORI-funded work.

    Explore Our Portfolio of Funded Projects

    Find out about projects based on the health conditions they focus on, the state they are in, and if they have results.

  • Topics
    Close mega-menu

    Topics

    • Addressing Disparities
    • Arthritis
    • Asthma
    • Cancer
    • Cardiovascular Disease
    • Children's Health
    • Community Health Workers
    • COVID-19
    • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment
    • Diabetes
    • Kidney Disease
    • Medicaid
    • Men's Health
    • Mental and Behavioral Health
    • Minority Mental Health
    • Multiple Chronic Conditions
    • Multiple Sclerosis
    • Obesity
    • Older Adults' Health
    • Pain Care and Opioids
    • Rare Diseases
    • Rural Health
    • Shared Decision Making
    • Telehealth
    • Transitional Care
    • Veterans Health
    • Women's Health

    Featured Topic: Women's Health

    Learn more about the projects we support on conditions that specifically or more often affect women.

  • Engagement
    Close mega-menu

    Engagement

    • The Value of Engagement
    • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
    • Influencing the Culture of Research
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engagement Resources
    • Engage with Us

    Engagement Tools and Resources for Research

    This searchable peer-to-peer repository includes resources that can inform future work in patient-centered outcomes research.

    Explore Engagement in Health Literature

    This tool enables searching for published articles about engagement in health research.

    Research Fundamentals: A New On-Demand Training

    It enables those new to health research or patient-centered research to learn more about the research process.

  • Funding Opportunities
    Close mega-menu

    Funding Opportunities

    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review
    • Awardee Resources
    • Help Center

    PCORI Funding Opportunities

    View and learn about the newly opened funding announcements and the upcoming PFAs in 2021.

    Tips for Submitting a Responsive LOI

    Find out what PCORI looks for in a letter of intent (LOI) along with other helpful tips.

    PCORI Awardee Resources

    These resources can help awardees in complying with the terms and conditions of their contract.

  • Meetings & Events
    Close mega-menu

    Meetings & Events

    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

    PCORI 2021 and Beyond

    During this webinar, PCORI leaders shared ways to get involved in PCOR, improvements to our funding opportunities, and more.

    Confronting COVID-19: A Webinar Series

    Learn more about the series and access recordings and summary reports of all six sessions.

    2020 PCORI Annual Meeting

    Watch recordings of all sessions, and view titles and descriptions of the posters presented at the virtual meeting.

You are here

  • Research & Results
  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Testing a Program to Support Decision...

This project has results

Testing a Program to Support Decision Making among Parents of Children in the PICU

Sign Up for Updates to This Study  

Results Summary and Professional Abstract

Results Summary
Download Summary Español (pdf) Audio Recording (mp3)

Results Summary

What was the research about?

The pediatric intensive care unit, or PICU, takes care of children who are seriously ill. These children may be recovering from surgery or have an infection or a life-threatening illness. Their parents may have to make hard choices about health care, life support, or end-of-life care.

In this study, the research team created and tested a program for parents in the PICU, called PICU Supports. In this program, trained counselors offered parents help and support when making choices about care. The team wanted to learn if parents in the program felt more satisfied with the process of making decisions than parents who received a brochure about the PICU.

What were the results?

Parents in PICU Supports and parents who received the brochure didn’t differ in how satisfied they were with the process of making decisions. In addition, parents in the two groups didn’t report differences in

  • Amount of regret about choices they made for their child’s care in the PICU
  • Worry, sadness, or stress
  • Quality of life
  • Perceptions of how well PICU staff worked together and communicated with families
  • Satisfaction with care

Who was in the study?

The study included 442 parents of 382 children in the PICU. All children received care at two children’s hospitals in Chicago, Illinois. Of the parents, 54 percent were white, 18 percent were black, 3 percent were Asian, 13 percent were other races, and 11 percent didn’t report a race. The average parent age was 35, 71 percent were women, and 9 percent didn’t report their gender. The average patient age was 5. The most common reasons for children being in the PICU were breathing problems and care after surgery. All children received PICU care for more than one day.

What did the research team do?

The research team worked with parents of children in the PICU and people who work in the PICU to design PICU Supports.

The research team then assigned families to one of two groups by chance: PICU Supports or the PICU brochure. For those in PICU Supports, a trained counselor met with families each weekday. The counselor also offered to hold weekly meetings for parents with PICU staff. They gave parents other resources as needed, such as a list of common questions for the doctor and a PICU handbook.

The second group received a brochure about the PICU. It had information about PICU staff, how to visit the PICU, a list of terms often used in the PICU, and ways parents could be involved in their child’s care.

The research team asked parents in both groups to fill out a survey three to five weeks after leaving the PICU.

Parents of children who had been in the PICU and healthcare professionals helped plan the study.

What were the limits of the study?

The study enrolled fewer families than planned. Fewer than 60 percent of parents filled out the survey three to five weeks after leaving the PICU. Parents who filled out surveys differed from those who didn’t in terms of education, race, ethnicity, age, marriage status, and gender. Also, PICU staff were aware of PICU Supports, which may have changed the way they talked with all parents in the study. As a result, it may have been hard to detect differences between the PICU Supports group and the brochure group.

Future research could compare other ways of supporting parents in the PICU as they make choices about their child’s care.

How can people use the results?

Hospitals can use the results when considering ways to support parents of children in the PICU.

Professional Abstract

Professional Abstract

Objective

To test the effect of a navigator-based communication support program versus an informational brochure on satisfaction with decision making among parents of children in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU)

Study Design

Design Elements Description
Design Randomized controlled trial
Population 442 parents of 382 children under the age of 18 who were receiving PICU care for more than 1 day
Interventions/
Comparators
  • PICU Supports
  • Informational brochure about the PICU
Outcomes

Primary: parent satisfaction with decision making

Secondary: parent satisfaction with care, decision regret, anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress, health-related quality of life, perception of the healthcare team’s communication and collaboration

Timeframe 3- to 5-week follow-up for primary outcome

This randomized controlled trial tested the effect of PICU Supports, a navigator-based communication-support program, on parent satisfaction with decision making following PICU discharge. The research team designed PICU Supports, with input from parents of children in the PICU and PICU healthcare providers, to help parents making decisions related to health care, life support, and end-of-life care.

The research team randomly assigned families to receive either PICU Supports or an informational brochure. In PICU Supports, navigators, who were trained counselors, offered to meet with families each weekday. They also offered weekly meetings with parents and PICU staff and provided materials to parents as needed, such as a list of frequently asked questions and a PICU handbook. Navigators provided support to parents for decision making, managing emotions, and transitioning out of the PICU. In the second group, families received an informational brochure about the PICU, including a description of PICU staff, parking and visitation procedures, a glossary of terms often used in the PICU, and suggestions about how parents could participate in their child’s care.

The study included 442 parents of 382 PICU patients under the age of 18 receiving care from one of two children’s hospitals in Chicago, Illinois. Of the parents, 54% were white, 18% were black, 3% were Asian, and 13% were other races; 11% did not report their race. The average parent age was 35, and 71% were female; 9% did not report their gender. The average patient age was 5. The most common reasons for admission to the PICU were acute respiratory illness (37%) and postoperative care (31%).

Parents completed a survey to assess study outcomes three to five weeks after discharge from the PICU.

Parents of children who had been in the PICU and clinicians gave input about recruitment and study design.

Results

Three to five weeks after patient discharge from the PICU, parents in PICU Supports and parents who received the informational brochure did not differ significantly on satisfaction with decision making. Of parents in PICU Supports, 60% rated satisfaction with decision making as excellent compared with 56% of parents who received the informational brochure.

The two groups also did not differ significantly in secondary outcomes.

Limitations

The study did not enroll as many families as planned, and fewer than 60% of parents in the study returned surveys. Parents who returned surveys differed in education, race, ethnicity, age, marriage status, and gender from parents who did not return surveys. The healthcare teams were aware of PICU Supports, which may have changed communication with all parents in the study, making it difficult to detect differences between groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, parents in PICU Supports were not more satisfied with decision making than parents who received the informational brochure.

Future Research Needs

Future research could compare different ways of providing decision-making support to PICU families.

Final Research Report

View this project's final research report.

Journal Articles

Results of This Project

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

A Randomized Comparative Trial to Evaluate a PICU Navigator-Based Parent Support Intervention

Related Articles

American Journal of Critical Care

Navigator-Based Intervention to Support Communication in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

Association Between Resilience and Psychological Morbidity in Parents of Critically Ill Children

Pediatrics

Provider Perspectives on Use of Medical Marijuana in Children With Cancer

Journal of Patient Experience

The Process and Impact of Stakeholder Engagement in Developing a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Communication and Decision-Making Intervention.

Journal of Patient Experience

The Process and Impact of Stakeholder Engagement in Developing a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Communication and Decision-Making Intervention

More on this Project  

Peer-Review Summary

Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also assesses how the project addressed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts read a draft report of the research and provide comments about the report. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. These reviewers cannot have conflicts of interest with the study.

The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve descriptions of the conduct of the study or to clarify the connection between results and conclusions. Sometimes, awardees revise their draft reports twice or more to address all of the reviewers’ comments. 

Peer reviewers commented, and the researchers made changes or provided responses. The comments and responses included the following:

  • The reviewers asked that the researchers refer to the Four Supports study in the abstract. The researchers adapted that model for use in their PCORI-funded study. The researchers said they left the name of that intervention out intentionally because while it provided a preliminary framework, the intervention developed for this study differed substantially in content and structure, thanks to the work of the stakeholders. The reviewers insisted that the abstract still indicate that the intervention under study was a modification, and the researchers added a statement to that effect.
  • The reviewers expressed concern that the stakeholder parents who helped develop the intervention were not representative of the study population. The researchers added a table to the report listing the names and experience of the eight parent stakeholders. The researchers acknowledged that the stakeholders were not ethnically diverse and may overrepresent cases where children died. The researchers added comments about the representation of parents as well as other stakeholders to their study limitations section.
  • Given the lack of significant results at 3-5 weeks postdischarge, the reviewers wondered about the durability of the intervention and whether more pronounced results might be seen at other time points. The researchers suggested that measuring at an earlier time point could be more helpful and added a sentence to the report saying that they plan to conduct analyses of outcomes at the time of PICU discharge.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

View the COI disclosure form.

Project Details

Principal Investigator
Kelly N. Michelson, MD, MPH
Project Status
Completed; PCORI Public and Professional Abstracts, and Final Research Report Posted
Project Title
Improving Communication in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit for Patients Facing Life-Changing Decisions
Board Approval Date
September 2013
Project End Date
July 2019
Organization
Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Year Awarded
2013
State
Illinois
Year Completed
2019
Project Type
Research Project
Health Conditions  
Other or Non-Disease Specific
Intervention Strategies
Care Coordination
Patient Navigation
Shared Decision Making
Other Health Services Interventions
Training and Education Interventions
Populations
Children -- 18 and under
Individuals with Multiple Chronic/co-morbid Conditions
Low Income
Racial/Ethnic Minorities
Funding Announcement
Communication and Dissemination Research
Project Budget
$1,854,139
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
10.25302/05.2020.CD.13046449
Study Registration Information
HSRP20143438
NCT02333396
Page Last Updated: 
August 15, 2020

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff
  • Our Vision & Mission
  • Contact Us

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Research Fundamentals
  • Research Results Highlights
  • Putting Evidence to Work
  • Peer Review
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • The Value of Engagement
  • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
  • Influencing the Culture of Research
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engagement Resources
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review
  • Awardee Resources
  • Help Center

Meetings & Events

March 8
Engagement Awards 2021 Special Cycle -- Applicant Office Hours (One)
March 15
Priorities on the Health Horizon: Informing PCORI's Strategic Plan (Webinar)
March 15
PCORI Workshop on Methodologic Challenges in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
[email protected]

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2021 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademark Usage Guidelines | Credits | Help Center