Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Find It Fast
  • Help Center
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • About Us
    Close mega-menu

    About Us

    • Our Programs
    • Governance
    • Financials and Reports
    • Procurement Opportunities
    • Our Staff
    • Our Vision & Mission
    • Contact Us

    Fact Sheets: Learn More About PCORI

    Download fact sheets about out work, the research we fund, and our programs and initiatives.

    Find It Fast

    Browse through an alphabetical list of frequently accessed and searched terms for information and resources.

    Subscribe to PCORI Email Alerts

    Sign up for weekly emails to stay current on the latest results of our funded projects, and more.

  • Research & Results
    Close mega-menu

    Research & Results

    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Research Fundamentals
    • Research Results Highlights
    • Putting Evidence to Work
    • Peer Review
    • Evidence Synthesis
    • About Our Research

    Evidence Updates from PCORI-Funded Studies

    These updates capture highlights of findings from systematic reviews and our funded research studies.

    Journal Articles About Our Funded Research

    Browse through a collection of journal publications that provides insights into PCORI-funded work.

    Explore Our Portfolio of Funded Projects

    Find out about projects based on the health conditions they focus on, the state they are in, and if they have results.

  • Topics
    Close mega-menu

    Topics

    • Addressing Disparities
    • Arthritis
    • Asthma
    • Cancer
    • Cardiovascular Disease
    • Children's Health
    • Community Health Workers
    • COVID-19
    • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment
    • Diabetes
    • Kidney Disease
    • Medicaid
    • Men's Health
    • Mental and Behavioral Health
    • Minority Mental Health
    • Multiple Chronic Conditions
    • Multiple Sclerosis
    • Obesity
    • Older Adults' Health
    • Pain Care and Opioids
    • Rare Diseases
    • Rural Health
    • Shared Decision Making
    • Telehealth
    • Transitional Care
    • Veterans Health
    • Women's Health

    Featured Topic: Women's Health

    Learn more about the projects we support on conditions that specifically or more often affect women.

  • Engagement
    Close mega-menu

    Engagement

    • The Value of Engagement
    • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
    • Influencing the Culture of Research
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engagement Resources
    • Engage with Us

    Engagement Tools and Resources for Research

    This searchable peer-to-peer repository includes resources that can inform future work in patient-centered outcomes research.

    Explore Engagement in Health Literature

    This tool enables searching for published articles about engagement in health research.

    Research Fundamentals: A New On-Demand Training

    It enables those new to health research or patient-centered research to learn more about the research process.

  • Funding Opportunities
    Close mega-menu

    Funding Opportunities

    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review
    • Awardee Resources
    • Help Center

    PCORI Funding Opportunities

    View and learn about the newly opened funding announcements and the upcoming PFAs in 2021.

    Tips for Submitting a Responsive LOI

    Find out what PCORI looks for in a letter of intent (LOI) along with other helpful tips.

    PCORI Awardee Resources

    These resources can help awardees in complying with the terms and conditions of their contract.

  • Meetings & Events
    Close mega-menu

    Meetings & Events

    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

    Special PCORI Webinar: February 2, 2pm ET

    Hear from PCORI leaders about ways to get involved in PCOR, improvements to our funding opportunities, and more. Register

    Confronting COVID-19: A Webinar Series

    Learn more about the series and access recordings and summary reports of all six sessions.

    2020 PCORI Annual Meeting

    Watch recordings of all sessions, and view titles and descriptions of the posters presented at the virtual meeting.

You are here

  • Research & Results
  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Using Home Coaching to Support Older ...

This project has results

Using Home Coaching to Support Older Adults with Chronic Illness after an Emergency Room Visit

Sign Up for Updates to This Study  

Results Summary and Professional Abstract

Results Summary

Results Summary

Download Summary Español (pdf) Audio Recording (mp3)

What was the research about?

Before patients leave the emergency room, or ER, hospital staff give instructions on how to care for their illness or injury at home. These instructions include getting follow-up care from their regular doctors. For older adults with long-term health issues, follow-up care is important so patients don’t need to return to the ER.

In this study, the research team tested the use of coaches for patients with Medicare insurance who had recently gone home after a visit to the ER. Coaches were from two Area Agencies on Aging, which offer programs and services that help older adults live on their own. Coaches helped patients

  • Schedule follow-up doctor appointments
  • Learn to identify and respond to signs of their health getting worse
  • Review concerns and instructions for taking medicines
  • Talk about care goals with their doctors
  • Arrange for services such as meal delivery and rides to doctor visits

The research team compared patients who worked with these coaches with patients who received usual care from the ER. The team looked at quality of life, the number of times patients had to return to the ER or hospital for care, and the number of times patients went to their regular doctors after their ER visits.

What were the results?

Patients who worked with coaches and those who didn’t had similar

  • Ratings of quality of life
  • Numbers of times they had to return to the ER or hospital
  • Numbers of visits with their regular doctors

Compared with patients who didn’t work with a coach, patients who worked with a coach were less likely to have a hospital stay if they did return to the ER.

Who was in the study?

The study included 1,322 patients getting care from two ERs in Florida. Of these, 48 percent were black, 48 percent were white, and 4 percent were other races. The average age was 72. All patients in the study had Medicare insurance. Most patients had more than one long-term health issue.

What did the research team do?

The research team assigned patients by chance to receive either 30 days of support from a health coach or the usual care patients get when leaving the ER. The health coaches met with patients once in person 24 to 72 hours after patients went home from the ER and up to three times by phone as needed during the rest of the study.

Patients who got usual care received standard instructions when going home from the ER. These instructions included how to care for their illness or injury at home and the importance of scheduling a visit with their regular doctors.

Patients, caregivers, staff from the Area Agency on Aging, doctors, and hospital managers helped the team design the study and interpret results.

What were the limits of the study?

Of the patients who received coaching, only 60 percent met with a coach during the study. Results may have been different if more patients had worked with the coaches after going home from the ER.

How can people use the results?

Hospitals can use these results when considering how to help patients after they go home from the ER.

Professional Abstract

Professional Abstract

Objective

To test the effectiveness of a patient coaching intervention, compared with usual post-emergency-department (ED) care, in improving quality of life and reducing readmissions for Medicare beneficiaries with chronic illness after discharge from the ED

Study Design

Design Elements Description
Design Randomized controlled trial
Population 1,322 Medicare beneficiaries with chronic illness recruited from 2 EDs
Interventions/
Comparators
  • ED-to-home coaching
  • Usual post-ED care
Outcomes

Primary: patient-reported quality of life as measured by physical function, perceived availability of helpful information or advice, anxiety, ED readmissions, hospitalizations, preventable hospitalizations, preventable ED readmissions

Secondary: number of visits with a primary care physician in an outpatient setting

Timeframe 31- to 60-day follow-up for primary outcomes

This randomized controlled trial tested the effectiveness of a patient coaching intervention in improving quality of life and reducing readmissions for Medicare beneficiaries with chronic illness after discharge from the ED compared with usual care.

Researchers recruited 1,322 patients receiving care from two EDs in Florida. Of these, 48% were black, 48% were white, and 4% were other races. The average age was 72. Most patients had multiple chronic conditions.

Researchers randomized patients to receive either ED-to-home coaching or usual post-ED care. Coaches received training in the ED-to-home coaching program and certification in community health work. They worked at two Area Agencies on Aging that provide programs and services to help older adults live on their own. Coaching consisted of one home visit that took place 24 to 72 hours after ED discharge and up to three follow-up phone calls. Coaches helped patients schedule and attend a follow-up doctor visit, recognize and respond to signs and symptoms of worsening disease, review and address concerns about medications, and communicate with healthcare providers. In addition, coaches helped patients access meal assistance programs and transportation to post-ED doctor visits as needed. Coaches documented all interactions and services that patients used, including patients’ self-defined health goals.

In usual care, patients received standard discharge instructions from the ED, which were directions on home care and written and verbal advice to follow-up with their personal doctors.

Researchers surveyed patients in person at baseline and again by phone 30 to 60 days after discharge to assess quality of life using PROMIS® measures. To assess ED visits, hospitalizations, and outpatient visits, researchers used Medicare claims data.

Patients, caregivers, Area Agency on Aging staff, physicians, and health system managers helped researchers design the study and interpret results.

Results

Overall, patients receiving ED-to-home coaching versus usual care did not differ significantly in patients’ quality of life as measured by patient-reported physical function, perceived availability of helpful information or advice, and anxiety. Patients also did not differ in overall ED readmissions, ED readmissions or hospitalizations where primary care may have prevented the need for another ED visit or hospitalization, overall hospitalizations, or number of visits with primary care physicians.

Compared with patients who received usual care, patients who received ED-to-home coaching were less likely to experience hospital admission if they returned to the ED (p<0.01).

Limitations

Of the patients randomized to the intervention, only 60% met with a coach. Results may have been different had more patients worked with the trained coaches after discharge from the ED.

Conclusions and Relevance

Coaching support, compared with usual care, did not improve quality of life or reduce ED visits or hospitalizations for patients with Medicare discharged from the ED.

Future Research Needs

Future research can explore different methods of improving quality of life and reducing ED and hospital readmissions for patients discharged from the ED.

Final Research Report

View this project's final research report.

Journal Articles

Results of This Project

Medical Care

Impact of an Emergency Department-to-Home Transitional Care Intervention on Health Service Use in Medicare Beneficiaries: A Mixed Methods Study

The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Feasibility of an ED-to-Home Intervention to Engage Patients: A Mixed-Methods Investigation

Related Articles

The Gerontologist

A Framework Illustrating Care-Seeking Among Older Adults in a Hospital Emergency Department

More on this Project  

PCORI Stories

In Care Transitions, a Chance to Make or Break Patients' Recovery 
A narrative on what happens when patients are harmed by poorly executed transitions between healthcare settings.

Videos

Bridging the Gap of Emergency Department-to-Home Transitions (right)
Donna Carden, MD, and Dawn Rosini, the project's patient stakeholder member, speak about the project, which seeks to improve emergency department (ED)-to-home transitions for elderly patients with chronic conditions.

Peer-Review Summary

Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also assesses how the project addressed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts read a draft report of the research and provide comments about the report. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. These reviewers cannot have conflicts of interest with the study.

The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve descriptions of the conduct of the study or to clarify the connection between results and conclusions. Sometimes, awardees revise their draft reports twice or more to address all of the reviewers’ comments. 

Peer reviewers commented, and the researchers made changes or provided responses. The comments and responses included the following:

  • Reviewers expressed concern about the overinterpretation of findings based on a large number of comparisons. Since statistical comparisons were not adjusted for multiple-hypothesis testing, the researchers revised the text to emphasize that outcomes based on multiple comparisons should be interpreted with caution. They also emphasized against overinterpreting marginally significant findings.
  • Given that the tested intervention did not seem to be effective, reviewers asked for insights on why the intervention did not work as hoped. The researchers added comments from patient participants and providers to their report. The researchers also noted that the increase in self-reported patient anxiety associated with the coaching intervention was not a surprise to patient stakeholders. The researchers noted that extra attention may have sensitized patients to their health condition and motivated them to use more healthcare services.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

View the COI disclosure form.

Project Details

Principal Investigator
Donna Lynne Carden, MD
Project Status
Completed; PCORI Public and Professional Abstracts, and Final Research Report Posted
Project Title
An Emergency Department-to-Home Intervention to Improve Quality of Life and Reduce Hospital Use
Board Approval Date
December 2013
Project End Date
December 2018
Organization
University of Florida
Year Awarded
2013
State
Florida
Year Completed
2018
Project Type
Research Project
Health Conditions  
Allergies and Immune Disorders
Immune Disorders
Cardiovascular Diseases
Stroke
Hypertension
Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolism
Coronary or Ischemic Heart Disease
Congestive Heart Failure
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Ulcers
Multiple/Comorbid Chronic Conditions
Muscular and Skeletal Disorders
Arthritis
Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders
Diabetes
Respiratory Diseases
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Respiratory Infections
Trauma/Injuries
Fractures
Intervention Strategies
Behavioral Interventions
Care Coordination
Other Health Services Interventions
Technology Interventions
Training and Education Interventions
Populations
Individuals with Multiple Chronic/co-morbid Conditions
Low Health Literacy/Numeracy
Low Income
Older Adults
Racial/Ethnic Minorities
Funding Announcement
Improving Healthcare Systems
Project Budget
$2,032,459
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
10.25302/07.2020.IHS.130601451
Study Registration Information
HSRP20143566
NCT02079987
Page Last Updated: 
August 9, 2020

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff
  • Our Vision & Mission
  • Contact Us

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Research Fundamentals
  • Research Results Highlights
  • Putting Evidence to Work
  • Peer Review
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • The Value of Engagement
  • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
  • Influencing the Culture of Research
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engagement Resources
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review
  • Awardee Resources
  • Help Center

Meetings & Events

February 2
PCORI 2021 and Beyond: Opportunities for Funding and Involvement in Patient-Centered Research
February 9
Board of Governors Meeting: February 9, 2021
February 11
Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement Winter 2021 Meeting

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
[email protected]

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2021 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademark Usage Guidelines | Credits | Help Center