Results Summary

What was the research about?

Understanding patients’ expectations and their experiences can help hospitals improve care. Hospitals often send surveys to patients to ask about their care. To create surveys quickly, hospitals sometimes pick questions from an item bank. An item bank is a list of survey questions available to use about a specific topic.

In this study, the research team created an item bank about childbirth care. The team used the item bank to create and carry out a survey about women’s preferences and experiences with care during and after childbirth. The team looked at which questions related closely to women’s overall ratings of their hospital care.

What were the results?

The item bank had 100 questions about the care women prefer or how they felt after childbirth. For example, there were questions about managing pain during childbirth and making decisions about breastfeeding. The item bank also had 60 questions about women’s personal traits, such as age or education level.

Using the results of a survey created from the item bank, the research team made a list of questions that related most closely to women’s ratings of their care. This list included questions about how well staff communicated and showed concern and respect. Women’s responses to questions about managing pain and some personal traits also related closely to their ratings of care.

Who was in the study?

The study included 2,757 adult women who were at least 20 weeks pregnant. The women were racially and ethnically diverse and lived across the United States. Of these women, 38 percent had at least some college education. The women spoke English or Spanish.

What did the research team do?

To create the item bank, the team looked at existing surveys to find questions about women’s experiences with childbirth care. The team grouped 5,902 questions into 19 topics. When questions were similar, the team picked the best question.

The research team gave the survey to women when they were pregnant and again after they gave birth.

Community members, advocates for pregnant women, doctors, and nurses gave input to the study.

What were the limits of the study?

The item bank had questions about cesarean delivery. The item bank also had questions about places other than hospitals where women give birth. However, not many people responded to these questions. In addition, there were no questions about care during pregnancy or after going home from the hospital.

Future studies could test questions about care for patients who have cesarean delivery. Studies can also see if hospitals can easily use the item bank questions.

How can people use the results?

Hospitals can create surveys from the item bank to learn about women’s experience with childbirth care. Hospitals can use what they learn to help improve care.

Final Research Report

View this project's final research report.

More to Explore...

Peer-Review Summary

Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also confirms that the research has followed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts who were not members of the research team read a draft report of the research. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. Reviewers do not have conflicts of interest with the study.

The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve how the research team analyzed its results or reported its conclusions. Learn more about PCORI’s peer-review process here.

In response to peer review, the PI made changes including

  • Completing major revisions in the structure of the report to make sections of the Methods much clearer in response to reviewer comments that the report was difficult to follow
  • Providing more details related to the structure and membership of the focus groups included early in the study
  • Clarifying that low recruitment numbers of women with birth plans other than traditional vaginal delivery in a hospital setting meant that the investigators were unable to analyze data for women planning Cesarean births, or women planning home births
  • Explaining how and why the investigators used "patient-reported experiences (PREs)" as terminology to differentiate such experiences from patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The former term was used to describe factors that were measured in pregnant women, whereas the latter term was used to describe factors postpartum. In response to reviewer confusion, the investigators renamed PREs to "values and preferences (V&P)"

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Project Information

Kimberly D. Gregory, MD, MPH
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
$752,713
10.25302/3.2019.ME.140210249
Expanding PROMIS Item Bank Development to the Pregnant Population

Key Dates

September 2014
December 2017
2014
2018

Study Registration Information

Tags

Has Results
Award Type
Health Conditions Health Conditions These are the broad terms we use to categorize our funded research studies; specific diseases or conditions are included within the appropriate larger category. Note: not all of our funded projects focus on a single disease or condition; some touch on multiple diseases or conditions, research methods, or broader health system interventions. Such projects won’t be listed by a primary disease/condition and so won’t appear if you use this filter tool to find them. View Glossary
State State The state where the project originates, or where the primary institution or organization is located. View Glossary
Last updated: January 20, 2023