Final Research Report

View this project's final research report.

Peer-Review Summary

Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also confirms that the research has followed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts who were not members of the research team read a draft report of the research. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. Reviewers do not have conflicts of interest with the study.

The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve how the research team analyzed its results or reported its conclusions. Learn more about PCORI’s peer review process here.

In response to peer review, the PI made changes including

  • Adding more detail about how missing data were handled in the study
  • Editing the Abstract for clarity
  • Removing discussion of patient and clinician study participants from the section engagement of patients and other stakeholders as study partners
  • Expanding the discussion of potential limitations of the study

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Project Information

Kurt Kroenke, MD
Indiana University
Incorporating PROMIS Symptom Measures into Primary Care Practice

Key Dates

September 2014
August 2017

Study Registration Information


Has Results
Award Type
State State The state where the project originates, or where the primary institution or organization is located. View Glossary
Last updated: March 4, 2022