Skip to main content
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Blog
  • Newsroom
  • Find It Fast
  • Help Center
  • Subscribe
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

PCORI

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Search form

  • About Us
    Close mega-menu

    About Us

    • Our Programs
    • Governance
    • Financials and Reports
    • Procurement Opportunities
    • Our Staff
    • Our Vision & Mission
    • Contact Us

    Fact Sheets: Learn More About PCORI

    Download fact sheets about out work, the research we fund, and our programs and initiatives.

    Find It Fast

    Browse through an alphabetical list of frequently accessed and searched terms for information and resources.

    Subscribe to PCORI Email Alerts

    Sign up for weekly emails to stay current on the latest results of our funded projects, and more.

  • Research & Results
    Close mega-menu

    Research & Results

    • Explore Our Portfolio
    • Research Fundamentals
    • Research Results Highlights
    • Putting Evidence to Work
    • Peer Review
    • Evidence Synthesis
    • About Our Research

    Evidence Updates from PCORI-Funded Studies

    These updates capture highlights of findings from systematic reviews and our funded research studies.

    Journal Articles About Our Funded Research

    Browse through a collection of journal publications that provides insights into PCORI-funded work.

    Explore Our Portfolio of Funded Projects

    Find out about projects based on the health conditions they focus on, the state they are in, and if they have results.

  • Topics
    Close mega-menu

    Topics

    • Addressing Disparities
    • Arthritis
    • Asthma
    • Cancer
    • Cardiovascular Disease
    • Children's Health
    • Community Health Workers
    • COVID-19
    • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment
    • Diabetes
    • Kidney Disease
    • Medicaid
    • Men's Health
    • Mental and Behavioral Health
    • Minority Mental Health
    • Multiple Chronic Conditions
    • Multiple Sclerosis
    • Obesity
    • Older Adults' Health
    • Pain Care and Opioids
    • Rare Diseases
    • Rural Health
    • Shared Decision Making
    • Telehealth
    • Transitional Care
    • Veterans Health
    • Women's Health

    Featured Topic: Women's Health

    Learn more about the projects we support on conditions that specifically or more often affect women.

  • Engagement
    Close mega-menu

    Engagement

    • The Value of Engagement
    • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
    • Influencing the Culture of Research
    • Engagement Awards
    • Engagement Resources
    • Engage with Us

    Engagement Tools and Resources for Research

    This searchable peer-to-peer repository includes resources that can inform future work in patient-centered outcomes research.

    Explore Engagement in Health Literature

    This tool enables searching for published articles about engagement in health research.

    Research Fundamentals: A New On-Demand Training

    It enables those new to health research or patient-centered research to learn more about the research process.

  • Funding Opportunities
    Close mega-menu

    Funding Opportunities

    • What & Who We Fund
    • What You Need to Know to Apply
    • Applicant Training
    • Merit Review
    • Awardee Resources
    • Help Center

    PCORI Funding Opportunities

    View and learn about the newly opened funding announcements and the upcoming PFAs in 2021.

    Tips for Submitting a Responsive LOI

    Find out what PCORI looks for in a letter of intent (LOI) along with other helpful tips.

    PCORI Awardee Resources

    These resources can help awardees in complying with the terms and conditions of their contract.

  • Meetings & Events
    Close mega-menu

    Meetings & Events

    • Upcoming
    • Past Events

    January 2021 Board of Governors Meeting

    The Board approved funding for a new research study relating to kidney health and a new funding allocation for PCORnet. Learn more

    Confronting COVID-19: A Webinar Series

    Learn more about the series and access recordings and summary reports of all six sessions.

    2020 PCORI Annual Meeting

    Watch recordings of all sessions, and view titles and descriptions of the posters presented at the virtual meeting.

You are here

  • Research & Results
  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Using a Bayesian Approach to Predict ...

This project has results

Using a Bayesian Approach to Predict Patients' Health and Response to Treatment

Sign Up for Updates to This Study  

Results Summary and Professional Abstract

Results Summary

Results Summary

Download Summary

What was the project about?

When choosing a treatment, doctors often look at research results that show how well the treatment worked in large groups of people. But many factors can affect how well a treatment works for an individual patient. These factors may include the patient’s sex, age, other health problems, or how they responded to treatments in the past. Some patient data sources, such as electronic health records, have this information. But existing statistical methods may not use these data well. For example, existing methods may not be able to take advantage of data that include measurements of a patient’s health from more than one point in time.

For this project, the research team developed new methods to analyze data that includes measurements of a patient’s health from different points in time. To develop the new methods, the team used a Bayesian approach. Bayesian approaches include findings from previous studies in the analysis, which can make results more accurate.

What did the research team do?

The research team used data on a patient’s own health and on how well a treatment worked for others to create the new methods. To help researchers use the new methods, the team created a computer program. Finally, the team used three studies to adapt the methods to predict health changes and responses to treatment for patients having one of three different health problems.

Patients, doctors, and a health plan administrative leader provided input to build and refine the methods. A group of researchers helped to create the computer program.

What were the results?

The methods predicted aspects of a patient’s health and changes in health over time. In the first study, the new methods helped researchers find out whether a child’s pneumonia was caused by a virus or bacteria. In the second study, the team used the new methods to see if active monitoring or surgery would work better for a patient with prostate cancer. In the third study, the new methods helped to predict a patient’s mental health symptoms over time.

What were the limits of the project?

The research team tested the new methods with three health problems; the methods might work differently for other health problems.

Future research could test the methods with other examples. Studies could also look at whether using the methods for treatment decisions can help improve patients’ health.

How can people use the results?

Researchers can use the methods to help predict changes in a patient’s health and how well a treatment will work.

Professional Abstract

Professional Abstract

Background

Researchers can predict a patient’s health trajectory and response to treatments, but to do so, they need improved statistical methods to leverage information in electronic health records. Better predictions of patient health outcomes can help clinicians improve clinical diagnoses and treatments. But gaps in existing statistical methods make it difficult to analyze health data to predict changes in individual patient health outcomes. This study developed Bayesian hierarchical models for analyzing diverse types of health data in electronic health records to answer research questions about patient health outcomes. Bayesian models incorporate data from previous trials or studies in the estimation of treatment effects.

Objective

To use a Bayesian analytic approach to develop and implement new methods and software for predicting individual patient health status, changes in health status over time, and response to treatment

Study Design

Design Element Description
Design Theoretical development, empirical analysis, software development
Data Sources and Data Sets Data from 3 clinical studies, including (1) the PERCH Study on childhood pneumonia, (2) the Brady Urological Institute active surveillance study on prostate cancer, and (3) the Janssen schizophrenia trial and National Network of Depression Centers project
Analytic Approach Bayesian hierarchical modeling
Outcomes

Model outputs, including (1) predictions of individual health status, (2) predictions of individual health trajectory, (3) estimates of treatment effects, and (4) measurement of heterogeneity of treatment

New software package called OSLER inHealth

Methods and Results

The research team developed a Bayesian hierarchical statistical model. The model had four components:

  • Estimation of the effects of current treatment and patient characteristics such as age and clinical history on health status
  • Use of multiple clinical measures to infer health status
  • Analysis of the effect of health measurements at one time point on subsequent treatment decisions
  • Specification of a model with two levels in which factors affecting the estimation of treatment effects could vary over time for the same patient and could also vary across many patients with similar characteristics

The research team then developed a software package called OSLER inHealth to help other researchers implement the Bayesian hierarchical model as well as existing methods to make individual predictions on health status and treatment effects.

Finally, the research team used three case studies to test and adapt the statistical model and software to predict a patient’s health status and changes in health over time. The team applied the methods to estimate

  • Whether a child’s pneumonia was caused by a virus or bacteria
  • The efficacy and safety of active surveillance compared with surgery for a patient with prostate cancer
  • A patient’s level and trajectory of depression, anxiety, and mania symptoms in the past, which could be used to predict future symptoms

Patients, clinicians, and a health plan administrative leader helped build and refine the statistical models for each case study. The research team also worked with a steering committee of researchers and statisticians to develop the software.

Limitations

The research team implemented the methods in three case studies; the performance of the methods may differ when applied to other health conditions.

Conclusions and Relevance

Bayesian hierarchical models can combine diverse sources of prior knowledge and data about an individual patient and a reference population to predict the patient’s health status and the likely effects of different treatment options. Such predictions can help doctors and patients monitor disease progression and make better clinical decisions.

Future Research Needs

Future research could systematically evaluate the new methods in larger and more diverse patient populations. Studies could also evaluate whether using the new methods in treatment decisions can improve health outcomes.

Final Research Report

View this project's final research report.

Journal Articles

Related Articles

Statistics in Medicine

Probabilistic cause-of-disease assignment using case-control diagnostic tests: A latent variable regression approach

Biostatistics

Estimating autoantibody signatures to detect autoimmune disease patient subsets

Journal of Psychiatric Research

A precision medicine approach for psychiatric disease based on repeated symptom scores

Clinical Infectious Diseases

Bayesian Estimation of Pneumonia Etiology: Epidemiologic Considerations and Applications to the Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health Study

Biometrics

A Bayesian hierarchical model for prediction of latent health states from multiple data sources with application to active surveillance of prostate cancer

European Urology

Prediction of the Pathologic Gleason Score to Inform a Personalized Management Program for Prostate Cancer

Biostatistics

Nested partially latent class models for dependent binary data; estimating disease etiology

American Journal of Epidemiology

Statistical Reasoning and Methods in Epidemiology to Promote Individualized Health: In Celebration of the 100th Anniversary of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C

Partially latent class models for case–control studies of childhood pneumonia aetiology

More on this Project  

Peer-Review Summary

Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also assesses how the project addressed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts read a draft report of the research and provide comments about the report. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. These reviewers cannot have conflicts of interest with the study.

The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve descriptions of the conduct of the study or to clarify the connection between results and conclusions. Sometimes, awardees revise their draft reports twice or more to address all of the reviewers’ comments. 

Peer reviewers commented and the researchers made changes or provided responses. Those comments and responses included the following:

  • Most of the research presented in this final report had already been published in peer-reviewed journals. The reviewers’ comments primarily related to the presentation of the research, acknowledging that it was difficult to apply the appropriate amount of technical information when summarizing mostly published research. The researchers made several changes in describing their research to improve the flow of the report and provide enough information for readers to understand the project.
  • The reviewers asked the researchers to clarify that their project was not intended to compare to existing approaches the impact of the new statistical models on diagnostic accuracy and treatment decisions. The researchers edited the text to clarify that this project was meant to be a proof-of-concept study that developed the new approaches. However, they noted that a larger study would be necessary for any comparisons to existing models.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

View the COI disclosure form.

Project Details

Principal Investigator
Scott Zeger, PhD
Project Status
Completed; PCORI Public and Professional Abstracts, and Final Research Report Posted
Project Title
Bayesian Hierarchical Models for the Design and Analysis of Studies to Individualize Healthcare
Board Approval Date
April 2015
Project End Date
August 2020
Organization
Johns Hopkins University
Year Awarded
2015
State
Maryland
Year Completed
2020
Project Type
Research Project
Funding Announcement
Improving Methods for Conducting Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Project Budget
$890,032
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
10.25302/09.2020.ME.140820318
Study Registration Information
HSRP20153591
Page Last Updated: 
December 3, 2020

About Us

  • Our Programs
  • Governance
  • Financials and Reports
  • Procurement Opportunities
  • Our Staff
  • Our Vision & Mission
  • Contact Us

Research & Results

  • Explore Our Portfolio
  • Research Fundamentals
  • Research Results Highlights
  • Putting Evidence to Work
  • Peer Review
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • About Our Research

Engagement

  • The Value of Engagement
  • Engagement in Health Research Literature Explorer
  • Influencing the Culture of Research
  • Engagement Awards
  • Engagement Resources
  • Engage with Us

Funding Opportunities

  • What & Who We Fund
  • What You Need to Know to Apply
  • Applicant Training
  • Merit Review
  • Awardee Resources
  • Help Center

Meetings & Events

February 2
PCORI 2021 and Beyond: Opportunities for Funding and Involvement in Patient-Centered Research
February 9
Board of Governors Meeting: February 9, 2021
February 11
Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement Winter 2021 Meeting

PCORI

Footer contact address

Patient-Centered Outcomes
Research Institute

1828 L Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 827-7700 | Fax: (202) 355-9558
[email protected]

Subscribe to Newsletter

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Vimeo

© 2011-2021 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademark Usage Guidelines | Credits | Help Center