Results Summary

What was the research about?

Chronic migraine is when people have headaches 15 or more days per month, with migraines for at least 8 of those days. Patients can take medicines, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicines and triptans, to relieve symptoms. But about half of people with chronic migraine use these medicines more often than recommended because of the pain and disability the headaches cause. When these medicines are taken too often for more than three months, it’s called medication overuse. Medication overuse can lead to more frequent headaches, migraine attacks, and other serious side effects.

In this study, the research team compared two approaches to treat adult patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse. In both, patients took a medicine to prevent migraines. Then patients either:

  • Stopped taking the overused medicine and switched to a different type of medicine up to two days per week to relieve symptoms, or
  • Continued taking the overused medicine on as many days as needed to relieve symptoms.

What were the results?

After 12 weeks, the two approaches worked about the same to reduce the number of days with a migraine. Patients who stopped taking the overused medicine had about 9.3 migraine days per month compared with 9.1 days for patients who continued it. The research team’s statistical analysis showed that staying on the overused medicine wasn’t worse for controlling symptoms than switching medicines.

But patients who stopped the overused medicine took medicine to treat symptoms less often than patients who continued it. They were also less likely to overuse migraine medicines.

The two approaches didn’t differ in:

  • Patients' quality of life
  • Whether migraines made it hard to do daily tasks or caused disability
  • Adverse events, such as high blood pressure, fatigue, or stomach pain
  • Whether patients remained in the study

Who was in the study?

The study included 720 adult patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse. Of these, 75 percent were White, 6 percent were Black, and 1 percent were Asian; 13 percent were Hispanic. The average age was 44, and 87 percent were women. Patients received care at one of 34 headache, neurology, or primary care clinics across the United States.

What did the research team do?

The research team assigned patients by chance to one of the two treatment approaches. They surveyed patients at the start of the study and again 9–12 weeks later.

Patients kept a diary for weeks 1–12 and other 4-week periods over one year. They recorded how often they had headaches, how intense they were, and how long they lasted. Patients also recorded whether they used medicine to treat symptoms.

Patients and headache specialists helped plan and conduct the study.

What were the limits of the study?

The study didn’t look at how different types of medicines prevent migraines or relieve symptoms.

Future research could compare how different types of medicines improve migraines and medication overuse.

How can people use the results?

Patients and their doctors can use the results when treating chronic migraine and medication overuse.

Final Research Report

View this project's final research report.

More to Explore...

Media Mentions

Neurology Podcast (April 4, 2022): Patient-Centered Treatment of Migraine with Medication Overuse
In this episode, Principal Investigator Todd J. Schwedt, MD, MS, discusses the treatment of chronic migraine with medication overuse through the patient-centered MOTS clinical trial.
Listen

Journal Citations

Article Highlight: Many people with chronic migraines use medication more often than recommended. This overuse can have the undesired effect of more migraines and headaches and other serious side effects. The MOTS (Medication Overuse Treatment Strategy) Trial compared two ways to treat adult patients who have chronic migraine and medication overuse. It found that not switching or limiting medication wasn’t worse than switching medication, according to results published in Neurology. But the study also found that patients who stopped the overused medicine took it to treat symptoms less often than patients who continued it. They were also less likely to overuse migraine medicines.

Read an accompanying editorial in Neurology.

Peer-Review Summary

Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research. It also assesses how the project addressed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts read a draft report of the research and provide comments about the report. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. These reviewers cannot have conflicts of interest with the study.

The peer reviewers point out where the draft report may need revision. For example, they may suggest ways to improve descriptions of the conduct of the study or to clarify the connection between results and conclusions. Sometimes, awardees revise their draft reports twice or more to address all of the reviewers’ comments.

Peer reviewers commented and the researchers made changes or provided responses. Those comments and responses included the following:

  • The reviewers were laudatory in their reviews of this report, stating that the study was well-designed and the report well-written.
  • One reviewer asked how much the COVID-19 pandemic affected study recruitment and participant attrition. The researchers acknowledged that the pandemic limited in-person research and clinical visits. With approval from the study sites and stakeholders, the researchers changed the protocol to allow for telehealth study visits in place of in-person visits.
  • The reviewer also questioned whether the mostly White makeup of the study participants was related to barriers to care for non-White patients to access adequate migraine care. The researchers acknowledged that there have been significant barriers to receiving adequate migraine care for people from the underrepresented racial and ethnic groups and added this study limitation to their report discussion.

Project Information

Todd J. Schwedt, MD, MS
Mayo Clinic Arizona
$6,443,260
10.25302/02.2022.PCS.150430133
Determining the Optimal Treatment Strategy for Patients Who Have Chronic Migraine with Medication Overuse

Key Dates

January 2016
February 2023
2016
2022

Study Registration Information

Tags

Has Results
Award Type
Health Conditions Health Conditions These are the broad terms we use to categorize our funded research studies; specific diseases or conditions are included within the appropriate larger category. Note: not all of our funded projects focus on a single disease or condition; some touch on multiple diseases or conditions, research methods, or broader health system interventions. Such projects won’t be listed by a primary disease/condition and so won’t appear if you use this filter tool to find them. View Glossary
Populations Populations PCORI is interested in research that seeks to better understand how different clinical and health system options work for different people. These populations are frequently studied in our portfolio or identified as being of interest by our stakeholders. View Glossary
Intervention Strategy Intervention Strategies PCORI funds comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) studies that compare two or more options or approaches to health care, or that compare different ways of delivering or receiving care. View Glossary
State State The state where the project originates, or where the primary institution or organization is located. View Glossary
Last updated: January 20, 2023