PCORI Collaboration Principles*
In alignment with its strategic plan, one of PCORI’s primary strategies for influencing research funded by others to be more patient-centered is to collaborate with other research funders in funding or managing research projects. Collaborations have other advantages. They are a key strategy for leveraging expertise from elsewhere in the research community to maximize the impact of PCORI investments; for avoiding unproductive redundancy in research funding with other entities; for leveraging financial and human resources from two or more entities toward a common purpose; and for increasing PCORI’s ability to acquire experience in aspects of research management by working alongside experts from other entities.
Our authorizing legislation (section (d)(2)(B)) suggests that when contracting for the management of funding and conduct of research, PCORI should “give preference” to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institutes of Health. Additionally, PCORI and its legislation recognize that a broad range of partners may bring the expertise and other strengths that make collaboration advantageous. PCORI has sought and will continue to actively seek collaborative partnerships that can advance the combined goals of scientific excellence and fiscal stewardship, as well as to broaden and expand the network of entities that are engaged in PCOR.
The PCORI Collaboration Principles, outlined below and available for download, describe the goals of PCORI collaborations and three types of collaborative arrangements that PCORI may establish with other entities. A collaboration is generally considered to be an agreement between PCORI and another entity (public or private) to jointly fund and/or to jointly manage aspects of a research initiative funded by PCORI. Although these three types of collaborative arrangements have a have differing objectives, each is premised on the aforementioned goals of scientific excellence and fiscal stewardship.
*Approved by the PCORI Board of Governors at its November 2014 meeting
General Principles of a Collaborative Arrangement
Regardless of the type of collaboration, every collaborative arrangement:
- Should combine the expertise and resources to maximize the impact of all PCORI investments and their contributions to improving health decision-making and outcomes
- Should embody and promote PCORI’s unique approach to research
- Should meet all applicable requirements and parameters of PCORI’s relevant statutory requirements (e.g. adherence to PCORI Methodology Standards and Peer Review Policy)
- Should preserve PCORI’s ability to impact decisions at key points in the research initiative or project
- Should be entered into with the collaborating entity with the most appropriate experience and expertise, requisite capacity, and a record of success for the project
- Should adhere to PCORI’s standards for communication, acknowledgement and attribution (e.g. citing PCORI in public announcements, use of the PCORI logo)
Existing PCORI Collaborations
PCORI collaborations may take different forms, depending on the project and the partner. Among those that we have pursued, and will continue to pursue, are:
Co-funding for Research
Current examples include:
Research to Tackle Health Disparities Related to Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure (National Institutes of Health)
Comparative Effectiveness of Health System vs. Multi-level Interventions to Reduce Hypertension Disparities
Lisa A. Cooper, MD, MPH; Johns Hopkins University
Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure in the US Black Belt-Addressing the Triple Threat
Monika M. Safford, MD; University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study of Patient-Centered Approach to Preventing Fall-Related Injuries in Older Adults (National Institute on Aging)
Preventing Serious Falls Among Older Adults
Shalender Bhasin, MD; Thomas Gill, MD; David B. Reuben, MD
Harvard Medical School; Yale Medical School; UCLA Medical School
Comparing Options for Management: Patient-Centered Results for Uterine Fibroids (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality)
Comparing Options for Management: Patient-Centered Results for Uterine Fibroids (COMPARE-UF)
Evan R. Myers, MD, MPH; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Funding the Next Generation of Learning-Health-System Researchers (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality)
Improving the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (American Heart Association)
Pilot Project on Coordination of Care for Frail Elderly (John A. Hartford Foundation)
Contracting for Management
Current examples include:
PCORnet Coordinating Center (Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Duke Clinical Research Institute)
Pilot Project Merit Review Process (NIH)
Specialized Staff Expertise, Training, and Collaboration
Staff detail in instances where staff from other entities can bring specialized expertise to PCORI and provide an opportunity for our staff to train and collaborate in new areas.
- Currently, we have no collaborations of this type.
Posted: December 23, 2014